Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2022Acceso abierto

Screen time and depression risk: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

Li L, Zhang Q, Zhu L, Zeng G, Huang H, Zhuge J, Kuang X, Yang S, Yang D, Chen Z, Gan Y, Lu Z, Wu C

Frontiers in psychiatry · 27 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Education Department of Jiangxi Province
Subvenciones
Education Department of Jiangxi Province (GJJ190814)

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-12-22 · Front Psychiatry · vol. 13 · pág. 1058572
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
68 citas · más que el 84% de estudios similares · 1.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
69 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Child Development and Digital Technology · Physical Activity and Health
Palabras clave
screen time, depression risk, depressive symptoms, mental health, COVID-19 pandemic, age differences, gender differences, depression prevention

13 autores

  • Liqing Li🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University; Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Qi Zhang🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University
  • Liyong Zhu🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University
  • Guohua Zeng🇨🇳Jiangxi University of Science and Technology
  • Hongwei Huang🇨🇳Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
  • Jian Zhuge🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University
  • Xiaorui Kuang🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University
  • Sule Yang🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University
  • Di Yang🇨🇳Gannan Medical University
  • Zhensheng Chen🇨🇳Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University
  • Yong Gan🇨🇳Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Zuxun Lu🇨🇳Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Chunmei Wu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaGannan Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

The impact of screen time on mental health, including depression, has attracted increasing attention from not only children and adolescents but also the elderly. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate the association between screen time and depression risk.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for cohort studies up to May 2022, and the reference lists of the included studies were also retrieved. A random-effect model was used to estimate the combined effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic. Potential publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and Begg's and Egger's tests.

Results

The final analysis included 18 cohort studies with a combined total of 241,398 participants. The pooled risk ratio (RR) was 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.14), with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 82.7%, P < 0.001). The results of subgroup analyses showed that the pooled RRs varied according to geographic locations, gender, age group, screen time in the control group, depression at the baseline, and whether the study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. No obvious evidence of publication bias was found.

Conclusion

This study indicates that screen time is a predictor of depressive symptoms. The effects of screen time on depression risk may vary based on the participant's age, gender, location, and screen time duration. The findings could have important implications for the prevention of depression.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.