Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2023Acceso abierto

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies

Lawler T, Warren Andersen S

Nutrients · 48 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
Medical Research Council
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [NIH/NCI]
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Cancer Institute (R00CA207848); Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228); National Institutes of Health (R00 CA207848)

Según 5 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2023-01-13 · Nutrients · vol. 15 · número 2 · pág. 422
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
59 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 4.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
93 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Folate and B Vitamins Research
Palabras clave
Mendelian randomization, Medicine, Internal medicine, Oncology, Cancer, Prostate cancer, Odds ratio, Breast cancer, Colorectal cancer, Gynecology, Biology
MeSH
humans, colorectal neoplasms, ovarian neoplasms, lung neoplasms, calcifediol, vitamin d, risk factors, polymorphism, single nucleotide, female, male, mendelian randomization analysis

2 autores

  • Thomas P. Lawler🇺🇸University of Wisconsin–Madison; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
  • Shaneda Warren Andersen🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Epidemiological studies suggest that higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is associated with lower risk for several cancers, including breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers. To mitigate confounding, genetic instrumental variables (IVs) have been used to estimate causal associations between 25-hydroxivtamin D and cancer risk via Mendelian randomization (MR). We provide a systematic review of 31 MR studies concerning 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer incidence and mortality identified from biomedical databases. MR analyses were conducted almost exclusively in European-ancestry populations and identified no statistically significant associations between higher genetically predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D and lower risk for total cancer or colorectal, breast, prostate, lung, or pancreatic cancers. In recent studies including ≥80 genetic IVs for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, null associations were reported for total cancer (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] per 1-standard deviation increase: 0.98 [0.93-1.04]), breast (1.00 [0.98-1.02]), colorectal (0.97 [0.88-1.07]), prostate (0.99 [0.98-1.01]), and lung cancer (1.00 [0.93-1.03]). A protective association was observed for ovarian cancer in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (0.78 [0.63-0.96] per 20 nmol/L increase, p-trend = 0.03), but not in the UK Biobank (1.10 [0.80-1.51]). Null associations were reported for other tumor sites (bladder, endometrium, uterus, esophagus, oral cavity and pharynx, kidney, liver, thyroid, or neural cells). An inconsistent protective association for cancer-specific mortality was also observed. Results from MR analyses do not support causal associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk for cancer incidence or mortality. Studies including non-White populations may be valuable to understand low 25-hydroxyvitamin D as a modifiable risk factor in populations with a higher risk of common cancers, including African ancestry individuals.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.