Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2023Financiación no declarada

Retrospective analysis of whole-body cryotherapy adverse effects in Division I collegiate athletes

Kelly EA, Forootan NS, Checketts JX, Frank A, Tangen CL

Journal of osteopathic medicine · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2023-03-16 · J Osteopath Med · vol. 123 · número 5 · págs. 249–257
Editorial
De Gruyter
Citado
5 citas · más que el 64% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
29 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Palabras clave
Athletes, Basketball, Context (archaeology), Medicine, Cryotherapy, Physical therapy, Adverse effect, Field hockey, Football, Family medicine, Psychology, Internal medicine, Surgery
MeSH
humans, exanthema, athletic injuries, cryotherapy, incidence, retrospective studies, adolescent, adult, female, male, athletes

5 autores

  • Emily Kelly🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaLake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
  • Nazilla Seyed Forootan
  • Jake Xavier Checketts🇺🇸Oklahoma State University Medical Center
  • Austin C. Frank🇺🇸Kent State University
  • Christopher L. Tangen

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Context

Although the physiological effects and the performance of athletes after utilizing whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) have been widely studied, there is a lack of data on its adverse effects. It is important to be aware of the adverse effects of any treatment for its use to be properly recommended.

Objectives

This study aims to provide insight to any adverse effects that collegiate athletes experienced after utilizing WBC to better utilize this therapeutic modality.

Methods

After the Institutional Review Board (IRB) deemed exemption, all 457 Division 1-A varsity athletes were recruited via email to participate in a retrospective survey. Participants consented to the study by continuing to the questions. The inclusion criteria were that they must be 18 years of age or older, had completed WBC at that university, and were a student-athlete. The survey was six questions long, and if any of the inclusion criteria was not met, they were redirected to end the survey. The data were analyzed utilizing odds ratios.

Results

Of the 457 student-athletes, 11.2% (n=51) responded and 6.3% (n=29) met the inclusion criteria. Responses were obtained from women's lacrosse (27.6%; n=8), women's gymnastics (24.1%, n=7), field hockey (17.2%, n=5), wrestling (6.9%, n=2), football (6.9%, n=2), women's cross country (3.5%, n=1), men's basketball (3.5%, n=1), women's volleyball (3.5%, n=1), softball (3.5%, n=1), and baseball (3.5%, n=1). Among the responses, 79.3% (n=23) were females and 29.7% (n=6) were males. Within 1 h of WBC, the most frequently reported adverse effects were skin rash (27.6%, n=8), itching (13.8%, n=4), and fatigue (6.9%, n=2). More than 1 h after WBC, the most frequently reported adverse effects were skin rash (20.7%, n=6), itching (10.3%, n=3), and increased energy (6.9%, n=2). When stratified by female and male athletes, for both within 1 h and more than 1 h after WBC, there were increased odds for females reporting adverse effects; however, neither were statistically significant (OR 4.58, p=0.19, 95% CI 0.46 to 45.61) (OR 3.84, p=0.25, 95% CI 0.39 to 38.36). Within 1 h of WBC, 58.6% (n=17) of subjects reported no adverse effects, and more than 1 h after WBC, 65.5% (n=19) subjects reported no adverse effects. The mean satisfaction level rating was 6.34 (range 0-10, n=29). When asked if they would do WBC again, 65.5% (n=19) responded "yes" and 34.5% (n=10) responded "no."

Conclusions

In this collegiate athlete population, negative adverse effects of WBC commonly included skin burns and itching while potentially proving a beneficial adverse effect of increased energy. Subjects commonly reported no adverse effects after WBC treatment as well.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.