Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2023Financiación no declarada

Aesthetic and physiological effects of naturalistic multimodal music listening

Czepiel A, Fink LK, Seibert C, Scharinger M, Kotz SA

Cognition · 11 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo clínico controlado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Sin resultado de salud

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2023-07-22 · Cognition · vol. 239 · pág. 105537
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
22 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 4.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
133 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Multisensory perception and integration · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Color perception and design
Palabras clave
Psychology, Facial muscles, Arousal, Rhythm, Syllable, Audiology, Facial expression, Sensory system, Cognitive psychology, Neuroscience, Communication
MeSH
sympathetic nervous system, humans, auditory perception, arousal, movement, music

5 autores

  • Anna M. Czepiel🇳🇱🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaMaastricht University; Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
  • Lauren Fink🇩🇪Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics; Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
  • Christoph Seibert🇩🇪Hochschule für Musik Karlsruhe
  • Mathias Scharinger🇩🇪Philipps University of Marburg; Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
  • Sonja A. Kotz🇳🇱🇩🇪Maastricht University; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Compared to audio only (AO) conditions, audiovisual (AV) information can enhance the aesthetic experience of a music performance. However, such beneficial multimodal effects have yet to be studied in naturalistic music performance settings. Further, peripheral physiological correlates of aesthetic experiences are not well-understood. Here, participants were invited to a concert hall for piano performances of Bach, Messiaen, and Beethoven, which were presented in two conditions: AV and AO. They rated their aesthetic experience (AE) after each piece (Experiment 1 and 2), while peripheral signals (cardiorespiratory measures, skin conductance, and facial muscle activity) were continuously measured (Experiment 2). Factor scores of AE were significantly higher in the AV condition in both experiments. LF/HF ratio, a heart rhythm that represents activation of the sympathetic nervous system, was higher in the AO condition, suggesting increased arousal, likely caused by less predictable sound onsets in the AO condition. We present partial evidence that breathing was faster and facial muscle activity was higher in the AV condition, suggesting that observing a performer's movements likely enhances motor mimicry in these more voluntary peripheral measures. Further, zygomaticus ('smiling') muscle activity was a significant predictor of AE. Thus, we suggest physiological measures are related to AE, but at different levels: the more involuntary measures (i.e., heart rhythms) may reflect more sensory aspects, while the more voluntary measures (i.e., muscular control of breathing and facial responses) may reflect the liking aspect of an AE. In summary, we replicate and extend previous findings that AV information enhances AE in a naturalistic music performance setting. We further show that a combination of self-report and peripheral measures benefit a meaningful assessment of AE in naturalistic music performance settings.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.