Association between ultra-processed foods consumption and the risk of hypertension: An umbrella review of systematic reviews
Wang Z, Lu C, Wang Y, E F, Mentis AFA, Li X, Yang K
Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese · 9 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Subvenciones
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky‐2021‐kb22); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky‐2021‐ct06)
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2023-08-03 · Hellenic J Cardiol · vol. 76 · págs. 99–109
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 13 citas · más que el 64% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 49 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (publicación gratuita) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Sodium Intake and Health · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Palabras clave
- ultra-processed foods, hypertension, hypertension risk, dietary intake, food processing, quality of evidence, risk of bias
- MeSH
- humans, hypertension, prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, systematic reviews as topic, food, processed
7 autores
- Ziyi Wang🇨🇳Lanzhou University
- Cuncun Lu🇨🇳China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
- Yongsheng Wang🇨🇳Lanzhou University
- E Fenfen🇨🇳Lanzhou University
- Alexios‐Fotios A. Mentis🇨🇳BGI Group (China); BGI Genomics
- Xiuxia Li🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaLanzhou University
- Kehu Yang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaLanzhou University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Several systematic reviews (SRs) have investigated the association between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and the risk of hypertension in various populations. However, the quality of the evidence remains unclear. This umbrella review was thus conducted to fill this gap.
Methods
We searched for SRs with and without meta-analyses comparing high UPF versus low UPF consumption on the risk of hypertension in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to August 2022. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022352934). The A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 2009 (PRISMA 2009) statement were used to evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of the included SRs. Stata 15/SE was used to reanalyse the data using the random-effects model, and the risk of bias of observational studies from included SRs was reassessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool. The certainty of the evidence body was assessed using the GRADE recommendation.
Results
Seven SRs were included in the umbrella review. Among them, nine observational studies (5 cross-sectional and 4 cohort studies), whose available data were resynthesised using meta-analysis. The methodological and reporting quality of the included SRs were relatively poor. The meta-analysis results revealed suggestive evidence of an association between high UPF consumption and the incidence of hypertension (odds ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 1.37, p < 0.001, 95% prediction interval: 0.92 to 1.64, critically low certainty) compared to low UPF consumption.
Conclusion
High UPF consumption is associated with an increased risk of hypertension. However, well-conducted SRs, including high-quality prospective cohort studies, are needed to further verify these findings.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.