The impact of ultra-processed foods on obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities in children and adolescents: a systematic review
Petridi E, Karatzi K, Magriplis E, Charidemou E, Philippou E, Philippou E, Zampelas A
Nutrition reviews · 64 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2023-08-07 · Nutr Rev · vol. 82 · número 7 · págs. 913–928
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 77 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 4.9× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 54 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Overweight, Obesity, Systematic review, Context (archaeology), Observational study, Cross-sectional study, Childhood obesity, Cohort, Environmental health, Cohort study, Meta-analysis, Gerontology, MEDLINE, Pediatrics, Internal medicine, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, cardiovascular diseases, diet, comorbidity, adolescent, child, pediatric obesity, cardiometabolic risk factors, food, processed
6 autores
- Evgenia Petridi🇨🇾University of Nicosia
- Kalliopi Karatzi🇬🇷Agricultural University of Athens
- Emmanuella Magriplis🇬🇷Agricultural University of Athens
- Evelina Charidemou🇨🇾University of Nicosia; University of Cyprus
- Elena Philippou🇨🇾🇬🇧University of Nicosia; King's College London
- Antonis Zampelas🇬🇷 · autor de correspondenciaAgricultural University of Athens
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Context
Over the past few decades, traditional foods have been displaced by ultra-processed foods (UPFs), with the latter being associated with health problems.
Objective
This scoping systematic review aimed to identify the relationship between UPF intake and overweight/obesity as well as other cardiometabolic risk factors during childhood and adolescence.
Data sources
The guidance for this protocol is the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). A systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library electronic databases based on prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria up to 6 February 2022.
Data extraction
A total of 17 observational studies-9 cross-sectional, 7 cohort-longitudinal, and 1 study reporting both cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes-among children and adolescents aged ≤18 years were eligible for inclusion in this review. Fourteen studies evaluated the consumption of UPFs in association with overweight/obesity and 9 studies examined the association of UPF consumption and cardiometabolic-related risk factors.
Data analysis
Most studies (14/17) showed that an increase in UPFs was associated with a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities among children and adolescents, whereas 4 of 17 studies (3 cross-sectional and 1 cohort) found no association. Most cohort and cross-sectional studies showed good quality according to the National Institutes of Health and Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment, respectively.
Conclusion
The positive association found between UPFs and overweight/obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities among children and adolescents raises concerns for future health. Further investigation is recommended to explore the role of specific types of UPFs on cardiometabolic conditions and to identify the amount of daily intake that increase risk in order to shape appropriate public health policies.
Systematic review registration
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022316432.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.