Dietary consumption of beef and red meat: a scoping review and evidence map on cognitive outcomes across the lifespan
Paul TL, Fleming SA
Public health nutrition · 5 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industriaMezcla carne procesada con no procesadaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Autores
- Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2023-10-06 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 26 · número 12 · págs. 2912–2926
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 6 citas · más que el 81% de estudios similares · 1.4× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 79 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Palabras clave
- Observational study, Cognition, Environmental health, Randomized controlled trial, Red meat, Consumption (sociology), Medicine, Psychology, Gerontology, Pathology, Psychiatry
- MeSH
- animals, cattle, humans, diet, cognition, longevity, adult, child, red meat
2 autores
- Tristen L. Paul🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Saint Mary of the Lake
- Stephen A. Fleming🇺🇸University of Saint Mary of the Lake
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objective
Mixed evidence exists on the impact of beef consumption on cognition. The goal was to create an evidence map capturing studies assessing beef consumption and cognition to reveal gaps and opportunities in the body of literature.
Design
A scoping review was conducted to locate studies up to March 2022 using PubMed and backwards citation screening. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers with conflict resolution, and a database was created and made publicly available.
Setting
Intervention and observational studies.
Participants
Humans of any age, sex and/or health status, without moderate to severe cognitive impairment and/or abnormalities.
Results
Twenty-two studies were identified that quantified beef or red meat intake and assessed cognition. Six studies assessed beef intake, with the remaining studies describing intake of red meat that may or may not include beef. Nine articles described randomised controlled trials (RCT), mostly conducted in children. Thirteen described observational studies, primarily conducted on adults and seniors. The most common cognitive domains measured included intelligence and general cognition, and memory. The majority of controlled studies were rated with high risk of bias, with the majority of observational trials rated with serious or greater risk of bias.
Conclusions
Red meat and beef intake and cognition is largely understudied. There is a significant lack of replication across study designs, populations, exposures and outcomes measured. The quality of the research would be considerably enhanced by focused assessments of beef intake (and not red meat in general) and specific cognitive domains, along with improved adherence to reporting standards.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.