The current and future costs of colorectal cancer attributable to red and processed meat consumption in Brazil
Rezende LFM, Rezende LFM, Malhão TA, da Silva Barbosa R, Schilithz AOC, da Silva RCF, Moreira LGM, Ferrari G, Machado PAN, Diogenes MEL
BMC health services research · 6 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Mezcla carne procesada con no procesadaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Climate and Land Use Alliance
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2023-10-31 · BMC Health Serv Res · vol. 23 · número 1 · pág. 1182
- Editorial
- BioMed Central
- Citado
- 6 citas · más que el 70% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 26 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Palabras clave
- Red meat, Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Environmental health, Consumption (sociology), Psychological intervention, Public health, Attributable risk, Health care, Cancer prevention, Cancer, Population, Internal medicine, Economic growth, Economics
- MeSH
- humans, colorectal neoplasms, diet, risk assessment, risk factors, meat, adult, brazil
9 autores
- Leandro do Carmo Rezende🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
- Thainá Alves Malhão🇧🇷Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
- Rafael da Silva Barbosa🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
- Arthur Orlando Corrêa Schilithz🇧🇷Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
- Ronaldo Corrêa Ferreira da Silva🇧🇷Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
- Luciana Grucci Maya Moreira🇧🇷Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
- Gérson Ferrari🇨🇱Universidad de Santiago de Chile
- Paula Aballo Nunes Machado🇧🇷Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
- Maria Eduarda Leão Diógenes🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Compelling evidence supports the association between red and processed meat consumption and increased risk of colorectal cancer. Herein, we estimated the current (2018) and future (2030) federal direct healthcare costs of colorectal cancer in the Brazilian Unified Health System attributable to red and processed meat consumption. Considering reduced red and processed meat consumption, we also projected attributable costs of colorectal cancer in 2040.
Methods
We retrieved information on red and processed meat consumption from two nationally representative dietary surveys, the Household Budget Survey 2008-2009 and 2017-2018; relative risks for colorectal cancer from a meta-analysis; direct healthcare costs of inpatient and outpatient procedures in adults ≥ 30 years with colorectal cancer (C18-C20) from 2008-2019 by sex.
Results
Attributable costs of colorectal cancer were calculated via comparative risk assessment, assuming a 10-year lag. In 2018, US$ 20.6 million (8.4%) of direct healthcare costs of colorectal cancer were attributable to red and processed meat consumption. In 2030, attributable costs will increase to US$ 86.6 million (19.3%). Counterfactual scenarios of reducing red and processed meat consumption in 2030 suggested that US$ 2.2 to 11.9 million and US$ 13 to 74 million could be saved in 2040, respectively.
Conclusion
Red and processed meat consumption has an escalating economic impact on the Brazilian Unified Health System. Our findings support interventions and policies focused on primary prevention and cancer.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.