Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2024Financiación no declarada

Parental Education for Limiting Screen Time in Early Childhood: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Poonia Y, Khalil S, Meena P, Shah D, Gupta P

Indian pediatrics · 9 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2024-01-01 · Indian Pediatr · vol. 61 · número 1 · págs. 32–38
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
12 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 15.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
24 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Child Development and Digital Technology · Educational Methods and Impacts · Physical Activity and Health
Palabras clave
screen time, early childhood, parental education, caregiver counseling, infant development, behavioral development, fine motor skills, adaptive skills, digital media exposure, measles-rubella vaccination
MeSH
humans, birth weight, parents, gestational age, child, child, preschool, educational status, screen time

5 autores

  • Yashika Poonia🇮🇳University College of Medical Sciences; Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital
  • Sumaira Khalil🇮🇳University College of Medical Sciences; Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital
  • Pinky Meena🇮🇳University College of Medical Sciences; Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital
  • Dheeraj Shah🇮🇳University College of Medical Sciences; Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital
  • Piyush Gupta🇮🇳 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity College of Medical Sciences; Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To assess the impact of focused parental education on limiting screen time in early childhood.

Methods

An open label randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi wherein 120 healthy children aged 9-10 months of age, born at term gestation and appropriate for gestational age (birth weight ≥ 2500 g), attending the immunization clinic reporting for measles-rubella (MR) vaccination were enrolled. Primary caregivers were randomized to either receive 30 minutes of in-person active counselling with pre-designed content including a printed pamphlet targeted at reduction of screen time (Educational group, n = 61) or to receive routine in-person counseling on general health measures (Control group, n = 61). All caregivers were followed up. Primary caregivers in both groups were reinforced telephonically every month for 6 months. At the end of six months, we assessed the proportion of children with screen-time > 1 hour/day and the median duration of screen-time (minutes /day). We also compared both groups in terms of changes in pre-post intervention developmental and behavioral scores (measured with Ages and Stages questionnaires).

Results

After 6 months of follow-up, 3% (2/61) children in the Educational group had screen time > 1 hour/day as compared to 53% (32/61) (P < 0.001) in the Control group. Median (IQR) for total screen duration in the Educational group was 35 (30,49) minutes/day compared to 75 (50,90) minutes/day in the Control group (P < 0.001). Children in the Educational group were also observed to have a significant change in behavioral score and fine motor and adaptive skills as compared to controls.

Conclusion

Parental education starting in infancy is a promising intervention to reduce screen exposure in children; it may also have a positive impact on their developmental and behavioral skills.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.