Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2024Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaAcceso abierto

Association between Processed Meat Protein Consumption and Incident Osteoporosis in Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Data (2005-2020)

Lee D, Lee SH, Park KH, Han K, Jeong E

Korean journal of family medicine · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-01-24 · Korean J Fam Med · vol. 45 · número 5 · págs. 268–273
Editorial
Korean Academy of Family Medicine
Citado
1 cita · más que el 59% de estudios similares · 0.4× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
17 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (publicación gratuita) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Sodium Intake and Health
Palabras clave
Medicine, Epidemiology, Osteoporosis, Cohort study, Prospective cohort study, Cohort, Gerontology, Association (psychology), Environmental health, Demography, Internal medicine

5 autores

  • Dohee Lee🇰🇷Seoul Medical Center
  • Soo Hyoung Lee🇰🇷Seoul Medical Center
  • Ki Hyun Park🇰🇷Seoul Medical Center
  • Kunhee Han🇰🇷Seoul Medical Center
  • Eunjin Jeong🇰🇷 · autor de correspondenciaSeoul Medical Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Osteoporosis is one of the inevitable diseases affecting an aging society, substantially impacting the quality of life of its population. Protein intake has been shown to be beneficial in reducing the incidence of osteoporosis, and the effects of both animal and vegetable proteins have been studied. However, the relationship between processed meat consumption and osteoporosis has not been studied in Korea. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the correlation between processed meat consumption and incident osteoporosis in adults.

Methods

Our analysis included 1,260 adults aged 50 years and older from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), recruited between 2005 and 2020. Participants were categorized into two groups according to their processed meat intake, assessed using a semi-quantitative 103-food item food frequency questionnaire. Diagnosis of osteoporosis was based on questionnaire answers. Multiple Cox hazard regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between processed meat intake and incident osteoporosis.

Results

During an average follow-up period of 8.8 years, 230 participants developed osteoporosis. According to the Cox proportional regression models, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of incident osteoporosis in the high intake group was 0.62 (0.41-0.94), compared to the low intake group after adjusting for confounding variables.

Conclusion

These findings reveal that processed meat protein intake is inversely related to the incidence of osteoporosis in adults aged 50 years and older. This in turn suggests that processed meat intake can be proposed as an additional strategy to prevent osteoporosis.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.