Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2024Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaAcceso abierto

Colorectal cancer's burden attributable to a diet high in processed meat in the Belt and Road Initiative countries

Liu G, Li CM, Xie F, Li QL, Liao LY, Jiang WJ, Li XP, Lu GM

World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 5 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-01-09 · World J Gastrointest Oncol · vol. 16 · número 1 · págs. 182–196
Citado
6 citas · más que el 87% de estudios similares · 2.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (publicación gratuita)
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Dietary Effects on Health
Palabras clave
Medicine, China, Environmental health, Disease burden, Burden of disease, Colorectal cancer, Demography, Cancer, Geography, Population, Internal medicine

8 autores

  • Gu Liu🇨🇳Chenzhou First People's Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
  • Changmin Li🇨🇳Chenzhou First People's Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
  • Fei Xie🇨🇳Chenzhou First People's Hospital
  • Qi-Lai Li🇨🇳Chenzhou First People's Hospital
  • Liangyan Liao🇨🇳Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities
  • Wen-Jun Jiang🇨🇳Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities
  • Xiaopan Li🇨🇳Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University
  • Guanming Lu🇨🇳Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities; First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) plays a significant role in morbidity, mortality, and economic cost in the Belt and Road Initiative ("B and R") countries. In addition, these countries have a substantial consumption of processed meat. However, the burden and trend of CRC in relation to the consumption of a diet high in processed meat (DHPM-CRC) in these "B and R" countries remain unknown.

Aim

To analyze the burden and trend of DHPM-CRC in the "B and R" countries from 1990 to 2019.

Methods

We used the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study to collate information regarding the burden of DHPM-CRC. Numbers and age-standardized rates (ASRs) of deaths along with the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were determined among the "B and R" countries in 1990 and 2019. Using joinpoint regression analysis, the average annual percent change (AAPC) was used to analyze the temporal trends of age-standardized DALYs rate (ASDALR) from 1990 to 2019 and in the final decade (2010-2019).

Results

We found geographical differences in the burden of DHPM-CRC among "B and R" countries, with the three highest-ranking countries being the Russian Federation, China, and Ukraine in 1990, and China, the Russian Federation, and Poland in 2019. The burden of DHPM-CRC generally increased in most member countries from 1990 to 2019 (all P P P P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The burden of DHPM-CRC varies substantially across "B and R" countries and threatens public health. Relevant evidence-based policies and interventions tailored to the different trends of countries in SDIs or Silk Routes should be adopted to reduce the future burden of CRC in "B and R" countries via extensive collaboration.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.