The association between consumption of red and processed meats with metabolic syndrome and its components in obese and overweight women: a cross-sectional study
Zandvakili A, Shiraseb F, Hosseininasab D, Aali Y, Santos RD, Mirzaei K
BMC women's health · 3 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
- Subvenciones
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (970316141144)
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2024-02-06 · BMC Womens Health · vol. 24 · número 1 · pág. 93
- Editorial
- BioMed Central
- Citado
- 3 citas · más que el 77% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 44 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Waist, Overweight, Confounding, Red meat, Obesity, Odds ratio, Cross-sectional study, Metabolic syndrome, Body mass index, Internal medicine, Environmental health
- MeSH
- humans, obesity, diet, risk factors, cross-sectional studies, meat, adult, iran, female, overweight, metabolic syndrome
6 autores
- Atousa Zandvakili🇮🇷Yasuj University of Medical Sciences
- Farideh Shiraseb🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Dorsa Hosseininasab🇮🇷Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
- Yasaman Aali🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Raul Dias Santos🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo; Hospital São Paulo
- Khadijeh Mirzaei🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaTehran University of Medical Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objectives
Previous studies have shown a relation between the consumption of different types of meats and chronic disorders. This study aims to investigate the association between red and processed meat intake with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in healthy obese and overweight women.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted on Iranian women. The dietary assessment and body composition were measured by a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and bioelectrical impedance analysis, respectively. Blood samples were collected by standard protocols.
Results
A total of 231 women (mean age 36.47 ± 8.44 years) were included in the current study. After controlling for potential confounders, there was a marginally significant associations between higher intake of processed meat with the MetS (OR:1.01, 95% CI: 0.94,2.94, P:0.06) and high serum triglycerides (TG) (OR:1.27, 95% CI: 0.94,2.98, P:0.07). There was a significant associations between high intake of red meats with lower odds of higher waist circumference (WC) (OR:0.31, 95% CI: 0.10,0.97, P:0.04). Also, there was a significant associations were found between high intake of processed meats with greater odds of having lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) (OR:0.64, 95% CI: 0.30,0.95, P:0.03).
Conclusions
The current study suggests that higher intakes of processed meat may be associated with the MetS in Iranian women with excess body weight, while this was not the case for red meat. More studies however are necessary in different communities to draw definitive conclusions.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.