Ultra-processed food consumption and human health: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses
Barbaresko J, Bröder J, Conrad J, Szczerba E, Lang A, Schlesinger S
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 33 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2024-02-16 · Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr · vol. 65 · número 11 · págs. 1999–2007
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 54 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 6.9× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 49 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Confidence interval, Incidence (geometry), Meta-analysis, Obesity, Systematic review, Environmental health, Type 2 diabetes, Metabolic syndrome, Disease, MEDLINE, Fatty liver, Internal medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Biology, Endocrinology
- MeSH
- humans, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, type 2, obesity, diet, nutritive value, food handling, meta-analysis as topic, fast foods, systematic reviews as topic, food, processed
6 autores
- Janett Barbaresko🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V.; Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
- Janine Bröder
- Johanna Conrad
- Edyta Szczerba🇩🇪Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V.; German Center for Diabetes Research; Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
- Alexander Lang🇩🇪Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V.; Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
- Sabrina Schlesinger🇩🇪Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V.; German Center for Diabetes Research; Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Recently, ultra-processed foods received a lot of attention, but also criticism. Our aim was to provide an overview of the existing evidence of ultra-processed food consumption on human health. We conducted a systematic search in four databases until January 5th, 2024. Systematic reviews with meta-analyses on ultra-processed food consumption as defined by the NOVA classification system were included. The certainty of evidence was evaluated by the GRADE approach. We identified 16 publications. Moderate certainty of evidence was found for all-cause mortality (Summary Risk Ratio per 50 g: 1.02; 95% confidence Interval (CI): 1.01, 1.03), cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality (per 50 g/d: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.06, and 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08), type 2 diabetes incidence (per 10%: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.13) and colorectal cancer (per 10%: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.07). For several outcomes such as inflammatory bowel diseases, obesity, metabolic syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, mental health as well as nutrient quality, similar estimates were observed, but certainty of evidence was limited. Discussing the NOVA concept, it remains unclear whether the processing of foods leads to increased health risks or if ultra-processed food consumption is only a measure for poor diet quality.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.