Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2024Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaAcceso abierto

Global, regional, and national burden of diet high in processed meat from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2019

Wang FX, Kong XH, Guo Z, Li LX, Zhang S

Frontiers in nutrition · 5 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-02-13 · Front Nutr · vol. 11 · pág. 1354287
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
7 citas · más que el 86% de estudios similares · 2.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
42 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Palabras clave
Burden of disease, Medicine, Disease burden, Environmental health, Demography, Cross-sectional study, Population

5 autores

  • Fengxia Wang🇨🇳Shanxi Medical University; Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Xianghua Kong🇨🇳Shanxi Medical University; Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Zhe Guo🇨🇳Shanxi Medical University; Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Lushan Li🇨🇳Shanxi Medical University; Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Shu Zhang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaShanxi Medical University; Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

The objective of this study is to explore the prevalence and attributable burden of diet high in processed meat (DHIPM) in global, regional, and national level due to the burden caused by unhealthy dietary pattern worldwide.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Materials and design

All the data involved in this research were obtained from Global Burden of Diseases Study 2019. DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, was used to estimate the prevalence, which was measured by summary exposure value (SEV) and attributable burden of DHIPM. The Spearman rank order correlation method was performed to measure the correlation between sociodemographic index (SDI) and the prevalence as well as attributable burden. The estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated to demonstrate the temporal trends.

Results

Globally, there were 304.28 thousand deaths and 8556.88 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) caused by DHIPM in 2019 and increased by 34.63 and 68.69%, respectively. The prevalence had decreased slightly from 1990 to 2019, however increased in most regions and countries, especially in middle SDI regions, despite the implicitly high prevalence in high SDI regions. Countries with higher SDI values were facing higher prevalence and attributable burden of DHIPM while developing countries were observed with severer temporal trends. Compared with women, men had suffered from lower exposure level however graver attributable burden of DHIPM in the past three decades.

Conclusion

The progress of continuous urbanization allowed increasingly severe prevalence and attributable burden of DHIPM, thus the challenge to alleviate this trend was acute. Effective measures such as education on beneficial dietary pattern and supplement on healthy food were urgently required, especially in developing regions and countries.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.