Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2024

Creatine supplementation for optimization of physical function in the patient at risk of functional disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Davies TW, Watson N, Pilkington JJ, McClelland TJ, Azzopardi G, Pearse RM, Prowle J, Puthucheary Z

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 10 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Sin clasificar
None
Gobierno
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Subvenciones
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2022-19-001); National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2021-19-009)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-02-28 · JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr · vol. 48 · número 4 · págs. 389–405
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
20 citas · más que el 78% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
95 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Palabras clave
creatine supplementation, physical function, functional disability, older adults, chronic disease, sit-to-stand test, muscle strength, grip strength, lean body mass, body composition, muscle function
MeSH
humans, chronic disease, creatine, body composition, dietary supplements, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, muscle strength, randomized controlled trials as topic, physical functional performance, persons with disabilities

8 autores

  • Thomas Davies🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaQueen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute
  • Naomi Watson🇬🇧Queen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute
  • James Pilkington🇬🇧Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Thomas J. McClelland🇬🇧Queen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute
  • Giada Azzopardi🇬🇧Queen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute
  • Rupert M. Pearse🇬🇧Queen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute
  • John Richard Prowle🇬🇧Queen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute
  • Zudin Puthucheary🇬🇧Queen Mary University of London; Royal London Hospital; William Harvey Research Institute

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

The efficacy of creatine replacement through supplementation for the optimization of physical function in the population at risk of functional disability is unclear.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception to November 2022. Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing creatine supplementation with placebos in older adults and adults with chronic disease. The primary outcome was physical function measured by the sit-to-stand test after pooling data using random-effects modeling. We also performed a Bayesian meta-analysis to describe the treatment effect in probability terms. Secondary outcomes included other measures of physical function, muscle function, and body composition. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

Results

We identified 33 RCTs, comprising 1076 participants. From six trials reporting the primary outcome, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-1.00; I2 = 62%; P = 0.04); using weakly informative priors, the posterior probability that creatine supplementation improves physical function was 66.7%. Upper-body muscle strength (SMD: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06-0.44; I2 = 0%; P = 0.01), handgrip strength (SMD 0.23; 95% CI: 0.01-0.45; I2 = 0%; P = 0.04), and lean tissue mass (MD 1.08 kg; 95% CI: 0.77-1.38; I2 = 26%; P < 0.01) improved with creatine supplementation. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low or very low because of a high risk of bias.

Conclusion

Creatine supplementation improves sit-to-stand performance, muscle function, and lean tissue mass. It is crucial to conduct high-quality prospective RCTs to confirm these hypotheses (PROSPERO number, CRD42023354929).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.