Consumption of red and processed meat during early pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes: a prospective birth cohort study
Norouziasl R, Jayedi A, Mirmohammadkhani M, Emadi A, Aghaamo S, Shab-Bidar S
Scientific reports · 4 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Semnan University
- Universidad u hospital
- Semnan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2024-03-03 · Sci Rep · vol. 14 · número 1 · pág. 5209
- Editorial
- Nature Portfolio
- Citado
- 5 citas · más que el 85% de estudios similares · 1.9× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 36 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Pregnancy, Red meat, Gestational diabetes, Hazard ratio, Obstetrics, Body mass index, Prospective cohort study, Multivitamin, Proportional hazards model, Gestation, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, diabetes, gestational, hypertension, weight gain, cohort studies, prospective studies, pregnancy, meat, adult, iran, female, young adult
6 autores
- Reyhane Norouziasl🇮🇷Semnan University of Medical Sciences; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Ahmad Jayedi🇮🇷Semnan University of Medical Sciences
- Majid Mirmohammadkhani🇮🇷Semnan University of Medical Sciences
- Alireza Emadi🇮🇷Semnan University of Medical Sciences
- Shahrzad Aghaamo🇮🇷Semnan University of Medical Sciences
- Sakineh Shab‐Bidar🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaTehran University of Medical Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
To investigate the association of red and processed meat intake with the risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) in Iranian mothers. A total of 635 pregnant mothers were included. Dietary intake was assessed by a 90-item food frequency questionnaire during the first trimester of pregnancy. Intakes of total red meat, unprocessed red meat, and processed meat were calculated and then, Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CIs of GDM across tertiles of red meat intake while controlling for age, occupation, pre-pregnancy body mass index, physical activities, history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and pregnancy hypertension, order of pregnancy, nausea during current pregnancy, multivitamin use during current pregnancy, weight gain during current pregnancy and total energy intake. The average age of the mothers was 28.80 ± 5.09 years, the average pre-pregnancy body mass index was 25.13 ± 4.43 kg/m2, and the average weight gain during pregnancy was 13.50 ± 5.03 kg. The multivariable-adjusted HRs of GDM for the third tertiles of red and processed meat, red meat, and processed meat intake were, respectively, 1.92 (95% CI 1.06, 3.49), 1.52 (95% CI 0.85, 2.72) and 1.31 (95% CI 0.73, 2.34) when compared to the first tertiles. Our prospective cohort study suggested that there was a positive association between the consumption of red and processed meat and with risk of GDM in a small sample of Iranian mothers with low red meat intake. More large-scale cohort studies in the Iranian population are needed to present more robust evidence in this regard.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.