Devices used for photobiomodulation of the brain-a comprehensive and systematic review
Fernandes F, Oliveira S, Monteiro F, Gasik M, Silva FS, Sousa N, Carvalho Ó, Catarino SO
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 33 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas, más trabajo en animales o laboratorio
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Subvenciones
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (2020. 00215.CEECIND); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UI/BD/09735/2020); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (10.54499/2020.00215.CEECIND/CP1600/CT0009); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDB/04436); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (10.54499/PTDC/EME-EME/1681/2021); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/EME-EME/1681/2021); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UI/BD/150951/2021); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (10.54499); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (2020.00215.CEECIND/CP1600/CT0009); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDB/04436/2020); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDP/04436/2020); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (2020.00215)
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2024-04-10 · J Neuroeng Rehabil · vol. 21 · número 1 · pág. 53
- Editorial
- BioMed Central
- Citado
- 40 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 3.5× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 121 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
- Palabras clave
- low-level laser therapy, brain stimulation, laser handpiece, light wavelength, power density, energy density, stimulation parameters, cognitive function, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, standardized reporting
- MeSH
- brain, humans, lasers, cognition, low-level light therapy
8 autores
- Filipa Ramalho Fernandes🇵🇹 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Minho
- Sofia Oliveira🇵🇹University of Minho
- Francisca Monteiro🇵🇹University of Minho
- Michael I. Gasik🇫🇮Aalto University
- Filipe Samuel Silva🇵🇹Labbels; University of Minho
- Nuno Sousa🇵🇹Clinical Academic Center of Braga; University of Minho
- Óscar Samuel Novais Carvalho🇵🇹Labbels; University of Minho
- Susana Oliveira Catarino🇵🇹 · autor de correspondenciaLabbels; University of Minho
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
A systematic review was conducted to determine the trends in devices and parameters used for brain photobiomodulation (PBM). The revised studies included clinical and cadaveric approaches, in which light stimuli were applied to the head and/or neck. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were used for the systematic search. A total of 2133 records were screened, from which 97 were included in this review. The parameters that were extracted and analysed in each article were the device design, actuation area, actuation site, wavelength, mode of operation, power density, energy density, power output, energy per session and treatment time. To organize device information, 11 categories of devices were defined, according to their characteristics. The most used category of devices was laser handpieces, which relate to 21% of all devices, while 28% of the devices were not described. Studies for cognitive function and physiological characterisation are the most well defined ones and with more tangible results. There is a lack of consistency when reporting PBM studies, with several articles under defining the stimulation protocol, and a wide variety of parameters used for the same health conditions (e.g., Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease) resulting in positive outcomes. Standardization for the report of these studies is warranted, as well as sham-controlled comparative studies to determine which parameters have the greatest effect on PBM treatments for different neurological conditions.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.