Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2022Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoAcceso abierto

Association of ultra-processed food consumption with colorectal cancer risk among men and women: results from three prospective US cohort studies

Wang L, Du M, Wang K, Khandpur N, Rossato SL, Drouin-Chartier JP, Steele EM, Giovannucci E, Song M, Zhang FF

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 83 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Organización sin fines de lucro
American Cancer Society
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Subvenciones
American Cancer Society (MRSG-17-220-01); American Cancer Society (U01 CA176726); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1R01MD011501); American Cancer Society (R00 CA215314); American Cancer Society (CA87969); National Institutes of Health (U01-CA167552); National Institutes of Health (P01 CA 87969); National Institutes of Health (U01-CA176726); National Institutes of Health (CA176726); National Institutes of Health (R00 CA 215314); National Institutes of Health (UM1‐CA‐186107); National Institutes of Health (CA-167552); National Institutes of Health (CA186107); National Institutes of Health (CA 87969)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-08-31 · BMJ · vol. 378 · pág. e068921
Citado
147 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 23.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
61 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Culinary Culture and Tourism
Palabras clave
Prospective cohort study, Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Environmental health, Cohort study, Consumption (sociology), Association (psychology), Cohort, Cancer, Oncology, Demography, Internal medicine, Psychology

10 autores

  • Lu Wang🇺🇸Tufts University
  • Mengxi Du🇺🇸Tufts University
  • Kai Wang🇺🇸Harvard University
  • Neha Khandpur🇺🇸🇧🇷Harvard University; Universidade de São Paulo
  • Sinara Laurini Rossato🇺🇸🇧🇷Harvard University; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Jean‐Philippe Drouin‐Chartier🇨🇦Université Laval; Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF); Centre Nutrition, santé et société
  • Eurídice Martínez Steele🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Edward L. Giovannucci🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Mingyang Song🇺🇸Harvard University; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Fang Fang Zhang🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTufts University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To examine the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of colorectal cancer among men and women from three large prospective cohorts.

Design

Prospective cohort study with dietary intake assessed every four years using food frequency questionnaires.

Setting

Three large US cohorts.

Participants

Men (n= 46 341) from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) and women (n=159 907) from the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2014; n=67 425) and the Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2015; n=92 482) with valid dietary intake measurement and no cancer diagnosis at baseline.

Main outcome measure

Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer, estimated using time varying Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors.

Results

3216 cases of colorectal cancer (men, n=1294; women, n=1922) were documented during the 24-28 years of follow-up. Compared with those in the lowest fifth of ultra-processed food consumption, men in the highest fifth of consumption had a 29% higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.53; P for trend=0.01), and the positive association was limited to distal colon cancer (72% increased risk; hazard ratio 1.72, 1.24 to 2.37; P for trend<0.001). These associations remained significant after further adjustment for body mass index or indicators of nutritional quality of the diet (that is, western dietary pattern or dietary quality score). No association was observed between overall ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer among women. Among subgroups of ultra-processed foods, higher consumption of meat/poultry/seafood based ready-to-eat products (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.44, 1.20 to 1.73; P for trend<0.001) and sugar sweetened beverages (1.21, 1.01 to 1.44; P for trend=0.013) among men and ready-to-eat/heat mixed dishes among women (1.17, 1.01 to 1.36; P for trend=0.02) was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer; yogurt and dairy based desserts were negatively associated with the risk of colorectal cancer among women (hazard ratio 0.83, 0.71 to 0.97; P for trend=0.002).

Conclusions

In the three large prospective cohorts, high consumption of total ultra-processed foods in men and certain subgroups of ultra-processed foods in men and women was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to better understand the potential attributes of ultra-processed foods that contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.