Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2024Acceso abierto

The association between screen time exposure and myopia in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

Zong Z, Zhang Y, Qiao J, Tian Y, Xu S

BMC public health · 53 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gobierno
Anhui Provincial Department of Education
Gobierno
Educational Commission of Anhui Province of China
Universidad u hospital
Research Fund of Anhui Institute of Translational Medicine
Gobierno
National Nature Science Foundation of China
Subvenciones
National Natural Science Foundation of China (2021YFC2702102)

Según 5 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-06-18 · BMC Public Health · vol. 24 · número 1 · pág. 1625
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
64 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 6.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
75 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Child Development and Digital Technology
Palabras clave
screen time, myopia, children, adolescents, computer use, television viewing, smartphone use, eye health, risk factors
MeSH
humans, myopia, adolescent, child, screen time

5 autores

  • Zhiqiang Zong🇨🇳Anhui Medical University
  • Yaxin Zhang🇨🇳Anhui Medical University
  • Jian-Chao Qiao🇨🇳Anhui Medical University
  • Yuan Tian🇨🇳Anhui Medical University
  • Shaojun Xu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaAnhui Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

This study aimed to systematically review epidemiological evidence on associations between screen time exposure and myopia in children and adolescents, and to quantitatively evaluate summary effect estimates from existing literature.

Method

There were three online databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, for epidemiological studies on screen time exposure and myopia published before June 1, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the correlation between screen time exposure and myopia using random or fixed-effect models by exposure type (categorical/continuous). We also performed subgroup analysis by screen device type, study quality, geographic region, and research period.

Results

We searched 7,571 records from three databases and identified 19 eligible studies, including 14 high-quality studies and 5 moderate-quality studies. Meta-analyses suggested that there was a statistically significant correlation between screen time (high vs. low) and myopia. The pooled ORs with 95%CIs were respectively 2.24 (1.47-3.42) for cross-sectional studies, and 2.39 (2.07-2.76) for cohort studies. We also found a significant association between continuous exposure to screen time (per 1 h/d increase) and myopia in cohort studies. The pooled ORs with 95%CIs were 1.07 (1.01-1.13). In subgroup analysis stratified by screen device type in cross-sectional studies, screen time exposures from computers (categorical: OR = 8.19, 95%CI: 4.78-14.04; continuous: OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.10-1.35) and televisions (categorical: OR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.02-2.10) were associated with myopia, while smartphones were not. Although publication bias was detected, the pooled results did not show significant changes after adjustment using the trim and fill method.

Conclusion

Our findings support that screen time exposure was significantly associated with myopia in children and adolescents. Notably, screen time exposure from computers may have the most significant impact on myopia.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.