Ultra-processed foods and cardiovascular disease: analysis of three large US prospective cohorts and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Mendoza K, Smith-Warner SA, Rossato SL, Khandpur N, Manson JE, Qi L, Rimm EB, Mukamal KJ, Willett WC, Wang M, Hu FB, Mattei J, Sun Q
Lancet regional health. Americas · 92 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Vínculos de autores con la industriaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Posiblemente financiado por la industria
- Gobierno
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Fundación México en Harvard
- Gobierno
- National Institutes of Health
- Gobierno
- Pan American Health Organization
- Autores
- Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
- Subvenciones
- National Institutes of Health (U01-CA167552); National Institutes of Health (R01‐HL‐088521); National Institutes of Health (R01-CA67262); National Institutes of Health (HL-035464); National Institutes of Health (HL060712); National Institutes of Health (R01 CA49449); National Institutes of Health (P01 CA 87969); National Institutes of Health (U01 HL-145386); National Institutes of Health (R01 HL034594); National Institutes of Health (CA-49449); National Institutes of Health (R01HL035464); National Institutes of Health (U01-CA176726); National Institutes of Health (HL034594); National Institutes of Health (CA176726); National Institutes of Health (R01DK120870); National Institutes of Health (R01 HL060712); National Institutes of Health (UM1‐CA‐186107); National Institutes of Health (CA-167552); National Institutes of Health (CA186107); National Institutes of Health (CA67262); National Institutes of Health (CA 87969); National Institutes of Health (HL088521); National Institutes of Health (DK120870)
Según 4 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2024-09-01 · Lancet Reg Health Am · vol. 37 · pág. 100859
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 92 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 11.6× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 115 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Prospective cohort study, Hazard ratio, Funnel plot, Meta-analysis, Cohort study, Publication bias, Internal medicine, Stroke (engine), Nurses' Health Study, Cohort, Confidence interval
13 autores
- Kenny Mendoza-Herrera🇺🇸Harvard University
- Stephanie A. Smith‐Warner🇺🇸Harvard University
- Sinara Laurini Rossato🇺🇸🇧🇷Harvard University; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
- Neha Khandpur🇳🇱Wageningen University & Research
- JoAnn E. Manson🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
- Lu Qi🇺🇸Tulane University
- Eric B. Rimm🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
- Kenneth Jay Mukamal🇺🇸Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Walter Churchill Willett🇺🇸Harvard University
- Μolin Wang🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
- Frank B. Hu🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
- Josiemer Mattei🇺🇸Harvard University
- Qi Sun🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Prospective associations between total and groups of ultra-processed foods (UPF) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) remained to be characterised. Our aim was to assess the association of total and group-specific UPF intakes with CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke in three large prospective cohorts of US adults. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses on the existing evidence on the associations of total UPF intake with these outcomes.
Methods
UPF intake was assessed through food frequency questionnaires in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS; n = 75,735), Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII; n = 90,813), and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS; n = 40,409). Cox regression estimated cohort-specific associations of total and group-specific UPF intake with risk of CVD (cases = 16,800), CHD (cases = 10,401), and stroke (cases = 6758), subsequently pooled through fixed-effect models. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled existing prospective findings on the UPF-CVD association identified on Medline and Embase up to April 5, 2024, without language restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, funnel plots, and Egger's tests, and meta-evidence was evaluated using NutriGrade.
Findings
The baseline mean (SD) age was 50.8 years (7.2) for the NHS, 36.7 years (4.6) for the NHSII, and 53.4 years (9.6) for the HPFS. The proportion of participants of White race was 97.7% in the NHS, 96.4% in the NHSII, and 94.9% in the HPFS. Among the three cohorts, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios [HRs (95% CIs)] for CVD, CHD, and stroke for the highest (vs. lowest) total UPF intake quintile were 1.11 (1.06-1.16), 1.16 (1.09-1.24), and 1.04 (0.96-1.12), respectively. UPF groups demonstrated divergent associations. Sugar-/artificially-sweetened drinks and processed meats were associated with higher CVD risk, whereas inverse associations were observed for bread/cold cereals, yoghurt/dairy desserts, and savoury snacks. Meta-analysing 22 prospective studies showed that total UPF intake at the highest category (vs. lowest) was associated with 17% (11%-24%), 23% (12%-34%), and 9% (3%-15%) higher CVD, CHD, and stroke risk. Meta-evidence quality was high for CHD, moderate for CVD, and low for stroke.
Interpretation
Total UPF intake was adversely associated with CVD and CHD risk in US adults, corroborated by prospective studies from multiple countries, also suggesting a small excess stroke risk. Nutritional advice for cardiovascular health should consider differential consequences of group-specific UPF. Replication is needed in racially/ethnically-diverse populations.
Funding
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants supported the NHS, NHSII, and HPFS.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.