Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2024Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Imaging and Surgical Procedures After Surface-Related Collegiate Football Injuries on Artificial Turf Versus Natural Grass: Prevalence and Trends Over 15 Seasons

Meyers MC, Sterling JC, Robinson SK

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-09-01 · Orthop J Sports Med · vol. 12 · número 9 · pág. 23259671241274144
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
1 cita · más que el 56% de estudios similares · 0.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
57 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Sports injuries and prevention · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Palabras clave
Medicine, Multivariate analysis of variance, Football, Incidence (geometry), Physical therapy, Mathematics, Statistics, Geography

3 autores

  • Michael C. Meyers🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaIdaho State University
  • James C. Sterling🇺🇸Baylor Medical Center at Garland
  • Shad K. Robinson🇺🇸Idaho State University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Few longitudinal studies exist comparing medical procedures after football injuries on artificial and natural grass surfaces.

Purpose/hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to specifically compare imaging and surgical procedures after surface-related collegiate football injuries on artificial turf versus natural grass. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in the incidence of imaging and surgical procedures, combined medical procedures, or combined substantial and severe injuries over time between these surfaces.

Study design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

A total of 39 universities across all Football Bowl Subdivision conferences were evaluated over 15 seasons (2006-2020). Playing surfaces evaluated were either a heavyweight artificial turf infill system (≥9.0 lb infill/ft2) or natural grass. Outcomes of interest included medical procedures across injury category, primary injury type, injury location, and specific procedures. Data involved multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) and Wilks λ criteria using general linear model procedures and were expressed as medical procedure incidence rates (IRs) per 10-game season.

Results

Overall, 2224 games were documented: 1106 (49.7%) on artificial turf and 1118 (50.3%) on natural grass. Of the 9137 total injuries reported, 4010 (44%) were surface-related cases. MANOVA indicated significant main effects between surfaces according to imaging procedure (F 2,1738 = 4.718; P = .009), surgical procedure (F 1,539 = 5.974; P = .003), and medical diagnosis (F 2,456 = 2.643; P = .040). Post hoc analyses indicated significantly lower (P P = .005) and combined substantial and severe injuries (P = .0007) irrespective of surface.

Conclusion

Results indicated that collegiate football competition on heavyweight artificial turf resulted in lower incidences of imaging and surgical procedures and medical diagnoses compared with natural grass.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.