Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2024

Comparing the effects of time-restricted eating on glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes with standard dietetic practice: A randomised controlled trial

Parr EB, Radford BE, Hall RC, Steventon-Lorenzen N, Flint SA, Siviour Z, Plessas C, Halson SL, Brennan L, Kouw IWK, Johnston RD, Devlin BL, Hawley JA

Diabetes research and clinical practice · 24 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Organización sin fines de lucro
Diabetes Australia
Universidad u hospital
Australian Catholic University
Subvenciones
Diabetes Australia (20YG-PARE)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-10-15 · Diabetes Res Clin Pract · vol. 217 · pág. 111893
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
36 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 8.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Dietary Effects on Health · Enhanced Recovery After Surgery · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
Medicine, Type 2 diabetes, Diabetes mellitus, Control (management), Gerontology, Physical therapy, Endocrinology, Artificial intelligence
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, obesity, blood glucose, dietetics, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, glycemic control, glycated hemoglobin, intermittent fasting

13 autores

  • Evelyn B. Parr🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaAustralian Catholic University
  • Bridget E. Radford🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Rebecca C. Hall🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Nikolai Steventon-Lorenzen🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Steve A. Flint🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Zoe Siviour🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Ch. T. Plessas🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Shona Leigh Halson🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Leah Brennan🇦🇺La Trobe University
  • Imre W. K. Kouw🇳🇱Wageningen University & Research
  • Rich D. Johnston🇦🇺Australian Catholic University
  • Brooke L. Devlin🇦🇺The University of Queensland
  • John A. Hawley🇬🇧🇦🇺Manchester Metropolitan University; Australian Catholic University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Aims

To test the efficacy of time-restricted eating (TRE) in comparison to dietitian-led individualised dietary guidance to improve HbA1c in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

In a parallel groups design, 51 adults (35-65 y) with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and overweight/obesity (HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol), BMI ≥25-≤40 kg/m2) commenced a six-month intervention. Following baseline, participants were randomised to TRE (1000-1900 h) or DIET (individualised dietetic guidance) with four consultations over four months. Changes in HbA1c (primary), body composition, and self-reported adherence (secondary) were analysed using linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 0.3% (4 mmol/mol) HbA1c was set a priori.

Results

Forty-three participants (56 ± 8 y, BMI: 33 ± 5 kg/m2, HbA1c: 7.6 ± 0.8%) completed the intervention. HbA1c was reduced (P=0.002; TRE: -0.4% (-5 mmol/mol), DIET: -0.3% (-4 mmol/mol)) with no group or interaction effects; TRE was non-inferior to DIET (-0.11%, 95%CI: -0.50% to 0.28%). Body mass reduced in both groups (TRE: -1.7 kg; DIET: -1.2 kg) via ∼900 kJ/d spontaneous energy reduction (P<0.001). Self-reported adherence was higher in TRE versus DIET (P<0.001).

Conclusions

When individualised dietary guidance is not available, effective, and/or suitable, TRE may be an alternative dietary strategy to improve glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.