Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2024Acceso abierto

Effects of Creatine Supplementation on the Performance, Physiological Response, and Body Composition Among Swimmers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Huang D, Wang X, Gonjo T, Takagi H, Huang B, Huang W, Shan Q, Chow DH

Sports medicine - open · 3 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-10-23 · Sports Med Open · vol. 10 · número 1 · pág. 115
Editorial
Springer Nature
Citado
4 citas · más que el 38% de estudios similares · 0.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
58 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Biochemical effects in animals
Palabras clave
creatine supplementation, swimming performance, swimmers, body composition, physiological responses, sprint swimming, endurance swimming, sports nutrition

8 autores

  • Dongxiang Huang🇨🇳🇭🇰Shaoguan University; Education University of Hong Kong
  • Xiaobing Wang🇨🇳Shaoguan University
  • Tomohiro Gonjo🇬🇧Heriot-Watt University
  • Hideki Takagi🇯🇵University of Tsukuba
  • Bo Huang🇨🇳South China Normal University
  • Wenrui Huang🇨🇳Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital
  • Qi Shan🇭🇰Education University of Hong Kong
  • Daniel H. K. Chow🇭🇰Education University of Hong Kong

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Although recent studies have increasingly focused on examining the potential benefits of creatine supplementation to improve performance in swimming events, the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming performance remains a topic of debate and controversy. A comprehensive meta-analytical review was undertaken to evaluate the effects of creatine supplementation on the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.

Methods

The research methodology adhered strictly to the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus) until March 23, 2024. Eligible studies that investigated the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming time, physiological parameters, and body composition in swimmers were included. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was employed to determine the collective effect and assess variations across distinct subgroups defined by swimming time, physiological metrics, and body composition. Meta-regression analysis was conducted on datasets comprising ten or more studies. Standardized mean differences (SMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. To evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was utilized.

Results

The systematic review included seventeen studies with a total of 361 subjects. No significant differences were observed in the overall effect during single sprint swimming (SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.26, 0.15; p = 0.61), repeated interval swimming (SMD: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.46, 0.25; p = 0.56), physiological response (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.23; p = 0.71), and body composition (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.41; p = 0.12) between creatine and placebo groups.

Conclusions

Creatine supplementation exhibited ineffectiveness in enhancing the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.