Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2024

Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Late 8-Hour Time-Restricted Eating for Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes

Hegedus E, Vu MH, Salvy SJ, Bakhsh J, Goran MI, Raymond JK, Espinoza JC, Vidmar AP

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 20 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Organización sin fines de lucro
Albert and Bettie Sacchi Foundation
Organización sin fines de lucro
American Diabetes Association
Universidad u hospital
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Gobierno
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Gobierno
NCATS NIH HHS
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Gobierno
NIMHD NIH HHS
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R01DK130851); National Cancer Institute (R01 CA258222); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1‐TR‐001855); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK130851); American Diabetes Association (11-22-ICTSN-32); National Cancer Institute (UL1TR000130); Children's Hospital Los Angeles (UL1TR000130); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1‐TR‐000130); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23 DK134801); National Cancer Institute (UL1TR001855); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1P50 MD017344); American Diabetes Association (UL1TR000130); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P50MD017344); National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001855); National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR000130)

Según 12 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2023-10-30 · J Acad Nutr Diet · vol. 124 · número 8 · págs. 1014–1028
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
23 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
74 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Dietary Effects on Health · Diabetes Management and Research · Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Palabras clave
adolescents, type 2 diabetes, obesity, glycemic control, HbA1c, body composition, fat mass, sleep, dietary intake, eating window, metformin, continuous glucose monitoring, intervention adherence, feasibility, weight loss, Latino youth, meal timing, dietary diversity
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, metformin, blood glucose, blood glucose self-monitoring, treatment outcome, fasting, feasibility studies, body composition, time factors, adolescent, female, male, young adult, meals, pediatric obesity, glycemic control, glycated hemoglobin

8 autores

  • Elizabeth Hegedus🇺🇸University of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
  • My H. Vu🇺🇸University of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles; Saban Research Institute
  • Sarah‐Jeanne Salvy🇺🇸University of Southern California
  • Jomanah A. Bakhsh🇺🇸University of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
  • Michael I. Goran🇺🇸University of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
  • Jennifer K. Raymond🇺🇸University of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
  • Juan Espinoza🇺🇸Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Lurie Children's Hospital
  • Alaina P. Vidmar🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

No trial to date has tested the effects of late time-restricted eating (lTRE) on glycemic control or body composition in adolescents with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Objective

The objective of the current study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of lTRE compared to a prolonged eating window in adolescents with T2D.

Design

A 12-week, randomized, controlled, feasibility study of lTRE compared to control in adolescents with obesity and new onset T2D was conducted.

Participants/setting

Eligible participants were 13-21 years old; with a diagnosis of T2D, on metformin monotherapy, recruited from Children's Hospital Los Angeles, between January 2021 and December of 2022. From 36 eligible participants, 27 were enrolled (75% recruitment rate; age: 16.5 ± 1.7 years, HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.9%, 22/27 [81%] Hispanic, 17/27 [63%] female, 23/27 [85%] public insurance; all p-values >.05), and 23 of 27 completed the protocol.

Intervention

Participants wore a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) daily and were randomized to one of two meal-timing schedules for 12-weeks: (1) lTRE (eating all food between 12:00 PM and 20:00 PM without calorie counting or recommended daily caloric intake) or (2) Control (eating over a period of 12 or more hours per day).

Main outcome measures

Study recruitment, retention and adherence to intervention arms were captured to operationalize feasibility. Glucose control (HbA1c), weight loss (%BMIp95), total body fat mass on DEXA, sleep, and dietary intake were explored as secondary outcomes.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were based on the intention to treat (ITT) population. Between-group differences in clinical outcomes were assessed using mixed-effects longitudinal regression models.

Results

Overall adherence to the 8-hr lTRE was 6.2 ± 1.1 d/wk and Control was 5.9 ± 0.9 d/wk. Participants assigned to lTRE indicated that limiting their eating window did not negatively affect their daily functioning and no adverse events were reported. In this pilot study, lTRE led to a reduction in %BMIp95 (-3.4%-95%CI: -6.1, -0.7, p = 0.02), HbA1c (-0.4%, 95%CI: -0.9, -0.01, p = .06), and ALT (-31.1 U/L, 95%CI: -60, -2, p = .05) within the group. There was no significant difference observed between lTRE and control across these measures (all p > .05). The lTRE group had a -271.4 (95% CI, -565.2, 5.2) kcal/day energy reduction compared to a +293.2 (95% CI: 30.4, 552.7) kcal/day increase in Control (p = .01). There were no significant changes observed in sleep or eating behaviors over the study period between groups.

Conclusions

Recruitment and retention rates suggest a trial of lTRE in adolescents with T2D was feasible. lTRE was seen as acceptable by participants and adherence was high. A revised intervention, building on the successful elements of this pilot alongside adapting implementations strategies to augment adherence and engagement, should therefore be considered.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.