Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2025Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Independence of Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Mediated Cardiovascular Risk: A Participant-Level Meta-Analysis

Bhatia HS, Wandel S, Willeit P, Lesogor A, Bailey K, Ridker PM, Nestel P, Simes J, Tonkin A, Schwartz GG, Colhoun H, Wanner C, Tsimikas S

Circulation · 98 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
Subvenciones
National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001444); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL166962); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL159156)

Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-11-04 · Circulation · vol. 151 · número 4 · págs. 312–321
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
113 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 43.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Palabras clave
lipoprotein(a), LDL cholesterol, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk, statin therapy, LDL cholesterol lowering, coronary artery disease, stroke, carotid revascularization, additive risk, LDL-C thresholds
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, lipoprotein(a), hydroxymethylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors, risk factors, aged, middle aged, female, male, cholesterol, ldl, randomized controlled trials as topic

13 autores

  • Harpreet Singh Bhatia🇺🇸University of California San Diego
  • Simon Wandel🇨🇭Novartis (Switzerland)
  • Peter Willeit🇦🇹Innsbruck Medical University; Universität Innsbruck
  • Anastasia Lesogor🇨🇭Novartis (Switzerland)
  • Keith Bailey🇨🇭Novartis (Switzerland)
  • Paul M. Ridker🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Paul John Nestel🇦🇺Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
  • Robert John Simes🇦🇺The University of Sydney; National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Andrew Maxwell Tonkin🇦🇺Monash University
  • Gregory G. Schwartz🇺🇸University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Helen Martina Colhoun🇬🇧Institute of Genetics and Cancer; MRC Human Genetics Unit
  • Christoph Wanner🇩🇪University of Würzburg; Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
  • Sotirios Tsimikas🇺🇸University of California San Diego

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels are independently associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the relationship between Lp(a) level, LDL-C level, and ASCVD risk at different thresholds is not well defined.

Methods

A participant-level meta-analysis of 27 658 participants enrolled in 6 placebo-controlled statin trials was performed to assess the association of LDL-C and Lp(a) levels with risk of fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease events, stroke, or any coronary or carotid revascularization (ASCVD). The multivariable-adjusted association between baseline Lp(a) level and ASCVD risk was modeled continuously using generalized additive models, and the association between baseline LDL-C level and ASCVD risk by baseline Lp(a) level by Cox proportional hazards models with random effects. The joint association between Lp(a) level and statin-achieved LDL-C level with ASCVD risk was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Compared with an Lp(a) level of 5 mg/dL, increasing levels of Lp(a) were log-linearly associated with ASCVD risk in statin- and placebo-treated patients. Among statin-treated individuals, those with Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL (≈125 nmol/L) had increased risk across all quartiles of achieved LDL-C level and absolute change in LDL-C level. Even among those with the lowest quartile of achieved LDL-C level (3.1-77.0 mg/dL), those with Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL had greater ASCVD risk (hazard ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.06-1.79]) than those with Lp(a) level ≤50 mg/dL. The greatest risk was observed with both Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL and LDL-C level in the fourth quartile (hazard ratio, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.46-2.48]).

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate the independent and additive nature of Lp(a) and LDL-C levels for ASCVD risk, and that LDL-C lowering does not fully offset Lp(a)-mediated risk.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.