Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2024Acceso abierto

Ultra-Processed Food Intake and Risk of Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pourmotabbed A, Awlqadr FH, Mehrabani S, Babaei A, Wong A, Ghoreishy SM, Talebi S, Kermani MAH, Jalili F, Moradi S, Bagheri R, Dutheil F

Nutrients · 11 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-11-01 · Nutrients · vol. 16 · número 21 · pág. 3767
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
13 citas · más que el 73% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Sleep and related disorders · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
ultra-processed foods, insomnia, NOVA classification, snacking, Western dietary pattern, adolescents, dietary intake, sleep disorders
MeSH
humans, sleep initiation and maintenance disorders, odds ratio, risk factors, eating, food handling, adolescent, adult, middle aged, female, male, fast foods, food, processed

12 autores

  • Ali Pourmotabbed🇮🇷Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
  • Farhang Hameed Awlqadr🇮🇶Sulaimani Polytechnic University
  • Sanaz Mehrabani🇮🇷Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Atefeh Babaei🇮🇷Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
  • Alexei Wong🇺🇸Marymount University
  • Seyed Mojtaba Ghoreishy🇮🇷Iran University of Medical Sciences
  • Sepide Talebi🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Mohammad Ali Hojjati Kermani🇮🇷Masih Daneshvari Hospital; Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Faramarz Jalili🇨🇦Dalhousie University
  • Sajjad Moradi🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaMaragheh University of Medical Sciences
  • Reza Bagheri🇮🇷University of Isfahan
  • Frédéric Dutheil🇫🇷Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Clermont Auvergne; Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

The objective of this investigation was to compile existing observational research and quantify the potential association between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and the risk of insomnia using meta-analysis.

Setting

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases with no restrictions until 29 June 2024. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were aggregated using a random-effects model, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Egger's regression asymmetry test assessed study quality and publication bias, respectively.

Results

Analysis of data from seven studies showed a significant positive association between higher intake of UPFs and an increased risk of insomnia (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.95; I2 = 62.3%; p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis indicated this positive relationship was particularly strong under the NOVA food classification (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.40; I2 = 78.5%; p = 0.009; n = 3) and with snack intake (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.71; I2 = 0.0%; p 2 = 57.4%; p < 0.001) but not in adults.

Conclusions

Our findings underscore a significant association between higher consumption of UPFs and increased risk of insomnia, particularly among adolescents. Further research is necessary to explore the intricacies of this association and to ensure the generalizability of these results.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.