Financiado en parte por Australian Football League and Cricket Australia under the Synthetic Turf Program
Cricket players' perceptions of playing on artificial turf
Twomey DM, Petrass LA
Journal of sports sciences · 1 cita
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Grupo de la industria
- Australian Football League and Cricket Australia under the Synthetic Turf Program
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2024-11-15 · J Sports Sci · vol. 42 · número 22 · págs. 2153–2161
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 1 cita · más que el 58% de estudios similares · 0.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 37 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Sport Psychology and Performance
- Palabras clave
- Cricket, Perception, Aeronautics, Computer science, Psychology, Simulation, Engineering, Biology, Ecology
- MeSH
- humans, poaceae, athletic injuries, perception, floors and floorcoverings, adult, male, athletic performance, young adult, surveys and questionnaires, cricket sport
2 autores
- D. Twomey🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaFederation University
- Lauren A. Petrass🇦🇺Federation University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
With the recent introduction of artificial turf outfield playing surfaces in community-level cricket, this paper presents the physical performance and injury-related perceptions of male, senior cricketers. Following validity and reliability testing, 43 cricketers from two clubs completed a questionnaire comprising three sections: demographic information; individual performance; and injury risk and severity. Descriptive variables were computed, and chi-square tests were conducted to identify differences in perceptions based on the field type that players were exposed to and their injury status. Most players preferred artificial turf for training (53.7%) and wet/rainy conditions (64.1%), but natural grass for competitive games (67.4%) and dry conditions (69.0%). There were significant differences in perceptions for game speed (p p = 0.015), and the overall physical performance quality based on injury status (p = 0.017) and field (p < 0.021). Skin injuries were the only injuries that were reported as more likely on artificial turf. In general, players did not feel that the technical and physical performance aspects of cricket were affected when playing on artificial turf compared to natural grass. However, the field type that players were exposed to significantly influenced their perceptions and highlights the importance of artificial turf composition for future adoption in cricket.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.