Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2024Acceso abierto

Treatment strategies for smartphone addiction: efficacy study of transcranial direct current stimulation and exergaming

Chen J, Jia Y, Zhu Y, Liu Q, Cheng F, Yang B, Zhang E

Frontiers in public health · 3 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Hubei Provincial Department of Education
Universidad u hospital
Hubei University of Medicine
Universidad u hospital
Hubei University

Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2024-11-05 · Front Public Health · vol. 12 · pág. 1416976
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
6 citas · más que el 70% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
40 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Palabras clave
smartphone addiction, transcranial direct current stimulation, exergames, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, executive function, decision-making, P300, feedback-related negativity, event-related potentials, university students, addiction rehabilitation
MeSH
humans, electroencephalography, students, video games, adult, china, female, male, young adult, transcranial direct current stimulation, smartphone, internet addiction disorder

7 autores

  • Jun Chen🇨🇳Beijing Sport University
  • Yuqing Jia🇨🇳Beijing Sport University
  • YanXia Zhu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaTaihe Hospital
  • Qin Liu🇨🇳Taihe Hospital
  • Cheng Fan🇨🇳Taihe Hospital
  • Bo Yang🇨🇳Taihe Hospital
  • EnMing Zhang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaBeijing Sport University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

Smartphone addiction is on the rise globally. This study aimed to compare the rehabilitative effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and exergames on smartphone addiction among college students. Additionally, we discussed the central mechanisms through changes in electroencephalography (EEG) to provide clinical insights.

Methods

Thirty-six participants were randomly assigned to three groups: control group, tDCS group (bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation), and exergame group. The intervention lasted for 4 weeks with twice-weekly sessions. Outcome measures included the Smartphone Addiction Scale - Chinese Version (SAS-C), Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) net scores, and event-related potential (ERP) data collected during the IGT, focusing on P300 and feedback-related negativity (FRN) amplitudes.

Results

All groups showed significant reductions in SAS-C scores post-intervention. Behaviorally, post-intervention scores improved, indicating significant effects of different interventions on participants' strategy choices. P300 amplitudes increased significantly at outcome electrode sites for all groups, with the most notable increase in tDCS group FC2 and CP1. FRN amplitudes decreased significantly post-intervention in the control and tDCS groups, with significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

All three interventions appeared to have alleviating effect on smartphone addiction. After 4 weeks, participants showed improved executive control and decision-making abilities. Specifically, significant effects were observed in the tDCS group, with increased P300 amplitudes in the frontal, parietal, and central regions, as well as FRN amplitudes in the central and frontal regions. This suggested that tDCS enhanced psychological resources and improved inhibition control capabilities.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.