Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2025

Dose-response relationship between dietary nitrate intake and nitric oxide congeners in various blood compartments and skeletal muscle: Differential effects on skeletal muscle torque and velocity

Wei C, Vanhatalo A, Black MI, Rajaram R, Massey G, Jones AM

Free radical biology & medicine · 8 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
University of Exeter
Gobierno
China Scholarship Council

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-01-27 · Free Radic Biol Med · vol. 229 · págs. 520–533
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
9 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 2.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
74 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Palabras clave
dietary nitrate, nitric oxide, nitric oxide metabolites, skeletal muscle, muscle torque, muscle contraction speed, physical activity, dose-response relationship
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, beta vulgaris, nitrates, nitrites, nitric oxide, s-nitrosothiols, cross-over studies, blood pressure, muscle contraction, dose-response relationship, drug, torque, adult, female, male, young adult, fruit and vegetable juices

6 autores

  • Chenguang Wei🇬🇧University of Exeter
  • Anni Vanhatalo🇬🇧University of Exeter
  • Matthew I. Black🇬🇧University of Exeter
  • Raghini Rajaram🇬🇧University of Exeter
  • Garry J. Massey🇬🇧University of Exeter
  • ANDREW MARK JONES🇬🇧University of Exeter

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Plasma nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-) increase in a dose-dependent manner following NO3- ingestion. To explore if the same dose-response relationship applies to other nitric oxide (NO) congeners in different blood compartments and skeletal muscle, as well as the subsequent physiological responses, we provided 11 healthy participants with NO3- depleted beetroot juice (placebo), and beetroot juice (BR) containing 6.4, 12.8 and 19.2 mmol NO3- in a randomised, crossover design. Blood and muscle samples were collected, and resting blood pressure (BP) was assessed, before and at 2.5-3 h post-ingestion. Muscle contractile function was assessed using a 5-min all-out maximal voluntary isometric knee extension test at 3.5 h post-ingestion. We found that plasma and skeletal muscle [NO3-], and whole blood S-nitrosothiols ([RSNOs]) increased dose-dependently, while plasma [NO2-] did not increase further with doses above 6.4 mmol NO3-. No significant increases in skeletal muscle [NO2-] were found following ingestion of any of these doses. Resting BP was only reduced after ingestion of 19.2 mmol NO3-. Mean peak torque and mean torque impulse during the first 10 muscle contractions were significantly enhanced following ingestion of both 12.8 mmol and 19.2 mmol NO3- compared to placebo, while the mean absolute rate of torque development (RTD) at 0-50 ms and 0-100 ms was significantly improved following ingestion of 6.4 mmol NO3- compared to placebo and 19.2 mmol NO3-. Significant correlations were found between changes in red blood cell [RSNOs] and changes in absolute RTD at 0-50 ms (rs = -0.70, P = 0.02) and 0-100 ms (rs = -0.84, P 3-. Our findings suggest that a high dose of 12.8 mmol NO3- is necessary to improve muscle contractile torque, while a lower dose of 6.4 mmol NO3- is sufficient to enhance muscle contractile velocity, at least for the type of exercise employed in the present study.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.