Long-term effect of repeated low-level red light therapy on myopia control: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ullah S, Umer MF, Chandran SP
European journal of ophthalmology · 2 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2025-02-21 · Eur J Ophthalmol · vol. 35 · número 4 · págs. 1432–1444
- Editorial
- SAGE Publishing
- Citado
- 4 citas · más que el 71% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 56 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Corneal surgery and disorders · Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Palabras clave
- Meta-analysis, Random effects model, Study heterogeneity, Medicine, Confidence interval, Publication bias, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, myopia, refraction, ocular, eyeglasses, visual acuity, child, axial length, eye, low-level light therapy
3 autores
- Saif Ullah🇲🇾Lincoln University College
- Muhammad Farooq Umer🇸🇦King Faisal University
- Suriyakala Perumal Chandran🇲🇾 · autor de correspondenciaLincoln University College
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
IntroductionMyopia is a refractive error where distant objects are not clearly seen and appear blurred. Goal of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy for children with myopia, which primarily focused on Axial length (AL) and Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) as primary endpoints.MethodsThe research compared outcomes between RLRL treatment with Single Vision Spectacles (SVS) for childhood myopia management. We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using "Myopia" and " Repeated Low-Level Red Light ". Mean differences (MD) were estimated and the effects of therapies measured. Publication bias and heterogeneity analysis were carried out by Inverted Precision Effect Test-Precision Effect Estimate Standard Error (PET-PEESE) (and subsequent Search Sequential Analysis) and Tau test. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP).ResultsThis meta-analysis comprised 1,714 participants: 824 in RLRL and 890 in SVS group. Pooled effect size for AL reduction was 0.953 ± 0.294, (95% credible interval (CI) 0.775 to 0.980). Pooled effect size for SER reduction was 1.521 ± 0.662 (95% CI 0.102 to 2.736). PET-PEESE analysis revealed no significant publication bias (p-value 0.407). Random effects models were employed for presence of significant heterogeneity (3.9 and 5.7 for AL; 5.7 for SER), alongside degree of variation (0.828 & 1.665) for Tau (τ), which estimates the between-study variance.ConclusionLong-term observations indicate that RLRL treatment significantly influences myopia management, leading to considerable reductions in both AL and SER. Additional research is essential to investigate potential long-term rebound effects.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.