Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2025Financiación no declarada

Total, unprocessed, and processed red meat intake in relation to the risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Ghosn B, Baniasadi MM, Jalalzadeh M, Esmaillzadeh A

Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 4 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2025-03-19 · Clin Nutr ESPEN · vol. 67 · págs. 265–275
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
4 citas · más que el 71% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
53 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Pancreatic cancer, Prospective cohort study, Internal medicine, Oncology, Cancer
MeSH
humans, pancreatic neoplasms, diet, risk factors, prospective studies, food handling, meat products, female, male, red meat

4 autores

  • Batoul Ghosn🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Mohammadreza Moradi Baniasadi🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Moharam Jalalzadeh🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Ahmad Esmaillzadeh🇮🇷Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center; Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Data on the association between red meat from both processed and unprocessed sources and risk of pancreatic cancer is controversial. Therefore, this study summarized current evidence on the relationship between red and processed red meat intake and pancreatic cancer risk through a meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Scopus for prospective cohorts up to October 2024. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest vs. the lowest category of the exposures were combined using random-effects models. Dose-response relations were explored by one-stage weighted mixed effects meta-analysis. 19 studies involving 4,291,065 participants with 13,820 pancreatic cancer cases were included. The highest intake of total red meat was positively related to risk of pancreatic cancer (Pooled HR: 1.12, 95%CIs: 1.01, 1.24; I2: 36.5 %, PQ-test: 0.10). Such association was not significant for unprocessed (Pooled HR: 1.05, 95%CIs: 0.88, 1.24; I2: 66.6 %, PQ-test: 0.002) and processed (Pooled HR: 1.02, 95%CIs: 0.86, 1.21; I2: 66.0 %, PQ-test: 0.001) red meat intake. No significant association was observed between each 3 serving/wk of total, unprocessed, and processed red meat and risk of pancreatic cancer. Also, no evidence for a nonlinear association was found for all associations. This meta-analysis suggests a positive relation between the highest consumption of total red meat and pancreatic cancer. However, this relation was not substantial in terms of unprocessed and processed red meat.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.