Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2025Acceso abierto

Impact of ultra-processed foods consumption on the burden of obesity and type 2 diabetes in Belgium: a comparative risk assessment

Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Guariguata L, Dénos C, Peñalvo JL, Vandevijvere S

BMC public health · 2 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-03-22 · BMC Public Health · vol. 25 · número 1 · pág. 1097
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
3 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 2.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
50 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Palabras clave
ultra-processed foods, obesity, type 2 diabetes, population attributable fraction, disability-adjusted life years, dose-response relationship, dietary intake, Belgium
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, obesity, risk assessment, cost of illness, adolescent, adult, aged, middle aged, belgium, female, male, fast foods, disability-adjusted life years, food, processed

5 autores

  • Claudia Cecilia Gutierrez-Ortiz🇧🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Antwerp
  • Leonor Guariguata🇧🇪KU Leuven
  • Claire Dénos🇧🇪Université Libre de Bruxelles; Ghent University
  • José Luis Peñalvo🇧🇪🇪🇸University of Antwerp; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Centro Nacional de Epidemiología
  • Stefanie Vandevijvere🇧🇪Sciensano (Belgium); Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

A high consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has been related to several chronic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of the burden of obesity and type 2 diabetes in Belgium that could be attributed to the consumption of UPFs.

Methods

A comparative-risk assessment framework was used. A literature search and a dose-response meta-analysis between UPFs intake and obesity and type 2 diabetes were performed. The risks were extracted from the curve dose-response meta-analysis and extrapolated to the mean of UPFs consumption by strata (5-year age category/sex/region) using the 2014/2015 Belgian Food Consumption Survey. The population attributable fraction and the attributable burden were then calculated for the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for type 2 diabetes.

Results

From the meta-analysis, for every 10% increase in UPFs intake (g/day), there was a 13% increase in risk of developing type 2 diabetes (RR:1.13, 95%IC 1.12-1.15, p<0.001) and for every 10% increase of energy intake from UPFs (kcal/day), there was a 5% increase in risk of developing obesity (RR:1.05, 95%IC 0.99-1.13, p=0.1321). Using these estimates, 21% of cases (277 056/1 286 454) of obesity in Belgium in 2014/2015 could be attributed to the UPFs intake. Similarly, for type 2 diabetes in Belgium in 2014/2015, 23% of cases (53 348/227 502) and 24% of DALYs (7 998/34 034) were attributed to UPFs consumption.

Conclusions

The sizeable impact of UPFs on the burden of obesity and type 2 diabetes in Belgium emphasizes the need to design and implement policies to address UPF consumption in Belgium.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.