Financiado en parte por MatPrat–Norwegian Centre for Consumer Information |Egg and Meat, MatPrat-Norwegian Centre for Consumer Information |Egg and Meat
Processed Meat Intake and Changes in Weight, Waist, Body Mass Index, and Fat Mass: Systematic Literature Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment of Cohort Studies of Adults
Händel MN, Rohde JF, Larsen SC, Sørensen TIA, Heitmann BL
Nutrition reviews · 2 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Oak Foundation
- Universidad u hospital
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
- Grupo de la industria
- MatPrat–Norwegian Centre for Consumer Information |Egg and Meat
- Grupo de la industria
- MatPrat-Norwegian Centre for Consumer Information |Egg and Meat
- Subvenciones
- Oak Foundation (OCAY-18-774_OFIL)
Según 4 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2025-03-24 · Nutr Rev · vol. 83 · número 10 · págs. 1827–1842
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 2 citas · más que el 50% de estudios similares · 0.4× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 54 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Palabras clave
- Waist, Meta-analysis, Medicine, Body mass index, Cohort study, Systematic review, Confidence interval, Cohort, MEDLINE, Weight management, Demography, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Overweight, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, body weight, body mass index, diet, cohort studies, meat products, adult, middle aged, female, male, waist circumference
5 autores
- Mina Nicole Händel🇩🇰 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Southern Denmark; Frederiksberg Hospital
- Jeanett Friis Rohde🇩🇰Frederiksberg Hospital
- Sofus Christian Larsen🇩🇰Frederiksberg Hospital
- Thorkild I. A. Sørensen🇩🇰🇨🇦University of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation; Education and Early Childhood Development
- Berit L. Heitmann🇩🇰University of Copenhagen; Frederiksberg Hospital
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Context
Previous reviews have indicated that abstaining from processed meat may play a part in weight management; however, the certainty of these results has not been assessed systematically.
Objective
We sought to estimate the association between processed meat intake (including studies specifically mentioning "processed meat" and/or listing processed meat items and subsequent change in weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and fat mass among adults by summarizing evidence of cohort studies.
Data sources
A systematic literature search was performed in Embase and Medline via Ovid (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) from inception to June 2024.
Data extraction
The data were extracted by 2 reviewers independently. The certainty in the estimates was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool.
Data analyses
The search resulted in a total of 2974 potential articles, of which 11 cohort studies (6 unique studies) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies (n = 381 291) were included in the random-effects model of measured body weight, resulting in a summary increase of 0.26 kg/y per 1 daily serving of processed meat (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.48; τ2: 0.03; I2: 92.95%). Four studies (n = 51 310) were included in the random-effects model of measured waist circumference, resulting in a summary increase of 0.14 cm/y per 1 daily serving of processed meat (95% CI, 0.02-0.26; τ2: 0.01; I2: 81.12%). The certainties of these estimates were low, due to serious risk of bias.
Conclusion
The analyses suggested a very weak association between increased processed meat intake and subsequent increase in measured weight, larger measured waist circumference, increase in self-reported BMI, and an increase in fat mass. However, due to methodological limitations the certainty of these results was low, and cautious interpretation of the results is warranted.
Systematic review registration
PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022335022.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.