Burden of colon and rectum cancer attributable to processed meat consumption in China, 1990-2021
Zhan Z, Chen X, Zheng J, Xu J, Zhou S, Guo Z, Chen B
Frontiers in nutrition · 14 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2025-03-28 · Front Nutr · vol. 12 · pág. 1488077
- Editorial
- Frontiers Media
- Citado
- 14 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 12.7× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 36 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Palabras clave
- Rectum, Consumption (sociology), Colorectal cancer, China, Cancer, Medicine, Environmental health, Geography, Internal medicine, Sociology
7 autores
- Zhouwei Zhan🇨🇳Fujian Medical University; Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
- Xiamei Chen🇨🇳Fujian Medical University
- Jinping Zheng🇨🇳Fujian Medical University; Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
- Jingjie Xu🇨🇳Fujian Medical University; Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
- Sijing Zhou🇨🇳Fujian Medical University; Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
- Zengqing Guo🇨🇳Fujian Medical University; Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
- Bijuan Chen🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaFujian Medical University; Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Colon and rectum cancer (CRC) poses a significant public health challenge, and diets high in processed meat have been identified as key risk factors. This study aims to assess the burden of CRC attributable to processed meat consumption in China from 1990 to 2021, focusing on mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and years of life lost (YLLs).
Methods
Data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study for CRC attributable to processed meat consumption in China from 1990 to 2021. The analysis included age-standardized rates for deaths, DALYs, YLDs, and YLLs, alongside age-period-cohort (APC) and decomposition analyses to examine temporal trends and contributing factors. Joinpoint regression was used to detect significant changes in trends.
Results
The burden of CRC attributable to processed meat consumption in China increased significantly between 1990 and 2021. In 2021, males exhibited higher mortality and DALY rates than females, particularly in older age groups. The age-standardized death rate rose from 0.23 to 0.32 per 100,000, and DALYs increased from 5.83 to 8.57 per 100,000. Joinpoint analysis revealed steep rises in DALYs and YLLs, especially during 2007-2011. APC analysis showed that older cohorts consistently exhibited higher death rates, while more recent cohorts displayed lower mortality. Decomposition analysis indicated that population growth and epidemiological changes drove the rise in mortality, with aging contributing to a reduction in deaths. These factors had a more pronounced impact on males.
Conclusion
The study highlights the growing burden of CRC linked to processed meat consumption in China over three decades, with significant gender differences and strong cohort effects. The findings call for targeted interventions to reduce processed meat consumption and mitigate CRC risk.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.