Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2025Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Lipidomic Markers of Processed Meat and Unprocessed Red Meat Intake and Risk of Diabetes in American Indians

Wen X, Miao G, Fretts AM, Chen M, Zhang Y, Umans JG, Cole SA, Best LG, Fiehn O, Zhao J

Diabetes care · 2 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
NIH HHS
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01-HL-041652); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL041642); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL109319); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL065521); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92019D00028); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL-041654); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL065520); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK107532); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL109282); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL109315); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92019D00027); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL109284); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92019D00030.); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92019D00029); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL109301)

Según 5 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-04-23 · Diabetes Care · vol. 48 · número 12 · págs. 2021–2030
Editorial
American Diabetes Association
Citado
3 citas · más que el 80% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
39 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Meat and Animal Product Quality · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Palabras clave
Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Red meat, Food science, Processed meat, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Pathology, Biology
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus, type 2, lipids, risk factors, meat products, adult, middle aged, indians, north american, female, male, biomarkers, red meat, lipidomics

10 autores

  • Xiaoxiao Wen🇺🇸University of Florida Health; University of Florida; University of Florida Health Science Center; Florida College
  • Guanhong Miao🇺🇸University of South Florida
  • Amanda M. Fretts🇺🇸University of Washington
  • Mingjing Chen🇺🇸University of Florida Health; University of Florida; University of Florida Health Science Center; Florida College
  • Ying Zhang🇺🇸University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
  • Jason G. Umans🇺🇸Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science; MedStar Health
  • Shelley A. Cole🇺🇸Texas Biomedical Research Institute
  • Lyle G. Best🇺🇸Missouri Breaks Industries Research (United States)
  • Oliver Fiehn🇺🇸University of California, Davis
  • Jinying Zhao🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of South Florida

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To identify lipidomic markers of habitual unprocessed red meat and processed meat intake and evaluate their associations with diabetes risk in American Indians.

Research design and methods

We studied 1,816 participants from the Strong Heart Family Study. Using untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we quantified 1,542 lipids (518 known) in fasting plasma at baseline and follow-up (∼5 years apart). Meat intake was assessed via Food Frequency Questionnaires. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to identify lipids associated with meat consumption. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine whether these lipids were associated with incident diabetes, independent of conventional risk factors, or with longitudinal glucose/insulin metrics.

Results

Diabetes developed in 66 of 1,076 participants with normal baseline glucose. After multiple testing correction, 15 known lipids, primarily plasmalogens, were associated with unprocessed red meat intake. Three plasmalogens were linked to incident diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.32 [95% CI 1.02-1.70] to 1.39 [1.08-1.78] per SD increase in baseline levels) and higher red meat intake. Eight lipids, mainly sphingomyelins, were associated with processed meat intake. Two sphingomyelins were linked to incident diabetes (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.02-1.75] and 1.36 [1.04-1.80]) and higher processed meat intake. Of 23 meat-related lipids, 20 were associated with altered glucose/insulin metrics, and 11 mediated positive associations between red or processed meat intake and fasting glucose.

Conclusions

We identified lipidomic markers of unprocessed red and processed meat consumption. Several lipids were independently associated with increased diabetes risk, potentially by mediating the association between meat intake and glucose metabolism.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.