Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2025Alimentación controladaAcceso abierto

A randomized controlled cross-over trial of differences in acute effects on serum metabolites from isocaloric meals based on red meat, fatty fish, or soy protein

Lindqvist HM, Hulander E, Bärebring L, Gjertsson I, Winkvist A

European journal of nutrition · 6 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controlada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Vetenskapsrådet
Universidad u hospital
Göteborgs Universitet
Universidad u hospital
University of Gothenburg

Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-05-26 · Eur J Nutr · vol. 64 · número 5 · pág. 187
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
5 citas · más que el 83% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
37 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Fatty Acid Research and Health
Palabras clave
Metabolite, Postprandial, Food science, Red meat, Soy protein, Meal, Plant protein, Chemistry, Fish meal, Biology, Biochemistry, Endocrinology, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Insulin
MeSH
animals, humans, arthritis, rheumatoid, methylamines, creatinine, dietary fats, dietary proteins, soybean proteins, diet, cross-over studies, postprandial period, adult, aged, middle aged, female, meals, red meat

5 autores

  • Helen M. Lindqvist🇸🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Gothenburg
  • Erik Hulander🇸🇪University of Gothenburg
  • Linnea Bärebring🇸🇪University of Gothenburg
  • Inger Gjertsson🇸🇪Sahlgrenska University Hospital; University of Gothenburg
  • Anna Winkvist🇸🇪University of Gothenburg

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Reducing red meat intake in the Western diet is beneficial for health and the environment. However, red meat is nutrient-rich, so understanding the impact of substituting it with other protein sources such as fish or plant-based proteins is essential, especially for vulnerable groups like the elderly and those with chronic diseases. The purpose of this study was to study the postprandial response in serum metabolites in women with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) after intake of red meat, fatty fish, and soy protein.

Methods

Women with RA (n = 24) consumed isocaloric meals that included burgers made from either red meat, fatty fish, or soy protein in a crossover design. Blood samples were taken in fasting state before the meal (0 h) and at intervals up to 5 h after eating. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analysis quantified serum metabolites, and multivariate models and univariate statistics were applied to compare postprandial metabolite changes across protein sources.

Results

Postprandial metabolite patterns varied significantly by protein type. The fatty fish meal led to a faster and higher increase in metabolites, including creatinine, isoleucine, valine, and trimethylamine N-oxide, compared to red meat. Unidentified lipids also differed. However, metabolite patterns after soy protein were similar to those after red meat.

Conclusion

This postprandial crossover trial found that intake of fatty fish lead to a quicker and more pronounced increase in key blood concentrations of metabolites compared to red meat. However, metabolite profiles in serum based on NMR-analysis were similar after intake of soy protein compared to red meat.

Trial registration

The PIRA (Postprandial Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial is Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04247009).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.