Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2025Acceso abierto

Intermittent fasting strategies and their effects on body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Semnani-Azad Z, Khan TA, Chiavaroli L, Chen V, Bhatt HA, Chen A, Chiang N, Oguntala J, Kabisch S, Lau DC, Wharton S, Sharma AM, Harris L, Leiter LA, Hill JO, Hu FB, Lean ME, Kahleová H, Rahelic D, Salas-Salvadó J, Kendall CW, Sievenpiper JL

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 47 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
University of Toronto
Organización sin fines de lucro
European Association for the Study of Diabetes
Gobierno
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Subvenciones
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (129920); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30-DK-056336)

Según 5 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-06-18 · BMJ · vol. 389 · pág. e082007
Citado
58 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 11.9× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
147 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Dietary Effects on Health · Diet and metabolism studies · Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Palabras clave
Intermittent fasting, Medicine, Weight loss, Meta-analysis, Anthropometry, Weight management, Randomized controlled trial, Clinical trial, Systematic review, Internal medicine, Physical therapy, MEDLINE, Obesity
MeSH
humans, body weight, weight loss, caloric restriction, diet, reducing, fasting, randomized controlled trials as topic, cardiometabolic risk factors, intermittent fasting

22 autores

  • Zhila Semnani‐Azad🇺🇸Harvard University
  • Tauseef Aized Khan🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto
  • Laura Chiavaroli🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto
  • Victoria Chen🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto
  • Hardil Anup Bhatt🇨🇦University of Toronto
  • Alisia Chen🇨🇦University of Toronto
  • Nicholas Chiang🇨🇦University of Toronto
  • Julianah O. Oguntala🇨🇦University of Toronto
  • Stefan Kabisch🇩🇪Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V.; German Center for Diabetes Research; Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • David C.W. Lau🇨🇦University of Calgary
  • Sean Wharton🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Arya Mitra Sharma🇨🇦University of Alberta
  • Leanne Harris🇬🇧University of Glasgow
  • Lawrence A. Leiter🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto
  • James O. Hill🇺🇸University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Frank B. Hu🇺🇸Harvard University
  • Michael EJ Lean🇬🇧University of Glasgow
  • Hana Kahleová🇺🇸Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
  • Dario Rahelić🇭🇷Catholic University of Croatia; Klinička bolnica Merkur; University of Osijek
  • Jordi Salas‐Salvadó🇪🇸Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud
  • Cyril W.C. Kendall🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan
  • John L. Sievenpiper🇨🇦 · autor de correspondenciaSt. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To assess the effect of intermittent fasting diets, with continuous energy restriction or unrestricted (ad-libitum) diets on intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes from randomised clinical trials.

Design

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources

Medline, Embase, and central databases from inception to 14 November 2024.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Randomised clinical trials comparing the association of intermittent fasting diets (alternate day fasting, time restricted eating, and whole day fasting), continuous energy restriction, and ad-libitum diets were included.

Main outcomes

Outcomes included body weight (primary) and measures of anthropometry, glucose metabolism, lipid profiles, blood pressure, C-reactive protein, and markers of liver disease.

Data synthesis

A network meta-analysis based on a frequentist framework was performed with data expressed as mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE).

Results

99 randomised clinical trials involving 6582 adults of varying health conditions (720 healthy, 5862 existing health conditions) were identified. All intermittent fasting and continuous energy restriction diet strategies reduced body weight when compared with ad-libitum diet. Compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate day fasting was the only form of intermittent fasting diet strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction (mean difference -1.29 kg (95% CI -1.99 to -0.59), moderate certainty of evidence). Additionally, alternate day fasting showed a trivial reduction in body weight compared with both time restricted eating and whole day fasting (mean difference -1.69 kg (-2.49 to -0.88) and -1.05 kg (-1.90 to -0.19), respectively, both with moderate certainty of evidence). Estimates were similar among trials with less than 24 weeks follow-up (n=76); however, moderate-to-long-term trials (≥24 weeks, n=17) only showed benefits in weight reduction in diet strategies compared with ad-libitum. Furthermore, in comparisons between intermittent fasting strategies, alternate day fasting lowered total cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-high density lipoprotein compared with time restricted eating. Compared with whole day fasting, however, time restricted eating resulted in a small increase in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol. No differences were noted between intermittent fasting, continuous energy restriction, and ad-libitum diets for HbA1c and high density lipoprotein.

Conclusions

Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit of weight loss with alternate day fasting in shorter duration trials. The current evidence provides some indication that intermittent fasting diets have similar benefits to continuous energy restriction for weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors. Longer duration trials are needed to further substantiate these findings.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05309057.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.