Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2025Acceso abierto

L-shaped nonlinear relationship between magnesium intake from diet and supplements and the risk of diabetic nephropathy: a cross-sectional study

Du J, Zhu X, Li Z, Sun Q, Sun M, Guan H, Xu J

Frontiers in nutrition · 1 cita

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
People's Government of Jilin Province

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-07-11 · Front Nutr · vol. 12 · pág. 1601338
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
1 cita · más que el 64% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
37 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Potassium and Related Disorders
Palabras clave
Quartile, Medicine, Confounding, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Magnesium, Logistic regression, Internal medicine, Analysis of variance, Linear regression, Endocrinology, Mathematics, Statistics, Confidence interval, Chemistry, Environmental health, Population

7 autores

  • Du Jia🇨🇳Jilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University
  • Xuetong Zhu🇨🇳Jilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University
  • Ze Li🇨🇳Jilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University
  • Qi Sun🇨🇳Jilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University
  • Miao Sun🇨🇳Jilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University
  • Heyuan Guan🇨🇳Jilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University
  • Jiancheng Xu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaJilin University; First Hospital of Jilin University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and objectives

Given the ongoing controversy regarding the relationship between magnesium and diabetic nephropathy (DN), this study systematically evaluate the association between total magnesium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources and the risk of DN, and further explore its potential nonlinear dose-response pattern and threshold effect.

Methods

Data were from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018. A multi-step analytical strategy was adopted: (1) confounders were selected using variance inflation factor and Boruta feature selection algorithm; (2) weighted multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between magnesium intake and DN; (3) restricted cubic splines (RCS), generalized additive models (GAM), and curve fitting were used to evaluate nonlinear dose-response trends; (4) piecewise regression identified potential thresholds; (5) subgroup analyses examined interactions across age, gender, BMI, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease.

Results

A total of 3,355 participants were included (DN group: n = 1,295; non-DN group: n = 2,060). The magnesium intake among DN patients was significantly lower than that of non-DN patients [300 ± 171 mg/day vs. 329 ± 161 mg/day, p p p = 0.003), which was further supported by GAM results. Piecewise regression analysis identified a turning point at 345.00 mg/day. Below this value, higher magnesium intake was significantly associated with lower DN risk; above this threshold, the protective effect plateaued. No significant interactions were found in the subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

Total magnesium intake was inversely associated with DN risk, with a threshold identified at 345.00 mg/day. Below this level, increases in magnesium intake were significantly associated with reduced DN risk, whereas above this level, additional magnesium intake was not significantly associated with further reductions in DN risk. These findings provide new epidemiological evidence to inform magnesium intake recommendations and DN prevention strategies.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.