Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2025

The Impact of Ultra-Processed Food Consumption on Frailty and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review

Kanbay M, Abdel-Rahman SM, Guldan M, Ozbek L, Covic A, Mallamaci F, Zoccali C

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 10 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Sin clasificar
The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-07-28 · J Hum Nutr Diet · vol. 38 · número 4 · pág. e70096
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
12 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 2.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
98 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutrition and Health in Aging · Frailty in Older Adults · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Palabras clave
ultra-processed foods, frailty, sarcopenia, older adults, grip strength, walking speed, muscle mass, systemic inflammation, multimorbidity, cardiometabolic disease, obesity, dietary intake, frailty prevention
MeSH
humans, inflammation, hand strength, diet, food handling, aged, aged, 80 and over, frail elderly, female, male, muscle strength, sarcopenia, fast foods, frailty, food, processed

7 autores

  • Mehmet Kanbay🇹🇷 · autor de correspondenciaKoç University
  • Sama Mahmoud Abdel‐Rahman🇹🇷Koç University
  • Mustafa Güldan🇹🇷Koç University
  • Laşin Özbek🇹🇷Koç University
  • Adrian Covic🇷🇴Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Francesca Mallamaci
  • Carmine Zoccali🇮🇹🇺🇸Biogem; Renal Research Institute

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and aim

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), foods with high levels of artificial additives and preservatives, often low in protein and essential nutrients despite being calorie-dense, have been associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular and kidney diseases, obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and frailty. Despite growing evidence on the adverse effects of UPFs, no systematic review has comprehensively assessed their association with frailty and sarcopenia. This review synthesizes current evidence on UPF intake and frailty prevalence and severity in older adults while exploring its impact on sarcopenia-related outcomes, including muscle mass, strength and function.

Materials and methods

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus was conducted until December 4, 2024, including studies on adults (≥ 18 years) that examined UPF intake and frailty or sarcopenia. The study is reported following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024615715).

Results

Among 43 included studies, high UPF consumption was consistently associated with increased frailty risk, multimorbidity, systemic inflammation and sarcopenia. A dose-dependent relationship was evident, with higher UPF intake linked to reduced grip strength, slower gait speed, elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, TNF-α) and lower muscle mass indices (MMI, AMMI). Mechanisms include chronic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation and muscle deterioration. UPFs also contribute to cardiometabolic disease and obesity, reinforcing frailty as a cumulative outcome of prolonged exposure. Some studies reported inconsistencies, particularly regarding obesity and physical activity as potential confounders.

Conclusion

UPFs are a modifiable determinant of frailty, influencing inflammation, sarcopenia and metabolism. Reducing UPF intake may represent a viable strategy for frailty prevention and improved health outcomes.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.