Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2025Acceso abierto

Swiping Disrupts Switching: Preliminary Evidence for Reduced Cue-Based Preparation Following Short-Form Video Exposure

Luo W, Zhao X, Jiang B, Fu Q, Zheng J

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
the Science and Technology Program of the State Administration for Market Regulation
Gobierno
Science and Technology Program of the State Administration for Market Regulation
Gobierno
Central Basic Research Funds Project of the China National Institute of Standardization
Gobierno
the Central Basic Research Funds Project

Según 4 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-08-06 · Behav Sci (Basel) · vol. 15 · número 8 · pág. 1070
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
6 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
27 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Neural dynamics and brain function
Palabras clave
short-form video, task switching, reactive control, cognitive control, attentional control, TikTok, Instagram Reels, media exposure effects

5 autores

  • Wanying Luo🇨🇳Peking University; China National Institute of Standardization
  • Xinran Zhao🇨🇳Peking University
  • Bingshan Jiang🇨🇳Peking University
  • Qiang Fu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaChina National Institute of Standardization
  • Juan’er Zheng🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaChina National Institute of Standardization

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The rapid rise of short-form video platforms such as TikTok and Instagram Reels has transformed digital engagement by promoting fragmented, high-tempo swiping behaviors and intense sensory stimulation. While these platforms dominate daily use, their impact on higher-order cognition remains underexplored. This study provides preliminary behavioral experimental evidence that even brief exposure to short-form video environments may be associated with reduced cue-based task preparation, a specific subcomponent of proactive cognitive flexibility. In a randomized between-subjects design, participants (N = 72) viewed either 30 min of TikTok-style content, a neutral documentary, or no video (passive control), followed by a task-switching paradigm with manipulated cue-target intervals (CTIs). As expected, the documentary and control group exhibited significant preparation benefits at longer CTIs, reflected in reduced switching costs-consistent with effective anticipatory task-set updating. In contrast, the short video group failed to leverage extended preparation time, indicating a selective disruption of goal-driven processing. Notably, performance at short CTIs did not differ across groups, reinforcing the interpretation that reactive control remained intact, while proactive preparation was selectively impaired. These findings link habitual "swiping" to disrupted task-switching efficiency-a phenomenon summarized as swiping disrupts switching. These findings suggest that short-form video exposure may temporarily bias attentional regulation toward stimulus-driven reactivity, thereby undermining anticipatory cognitive control. Given the widespread use of short-form video platforms-especially among young adults-these results underscore the need to better understand how media design features interact with cognitive control systems.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.