Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2025Acceso abierto

The impact of red meat and processed meat consumption on the risk of development and relapse of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Zhang Y, Yu Y, Jiang Z, Yu J, Zhang Z, An Z, Du Y, Mao Y, Hu L, Tang X, Zhao Y, Mao T

Frontiers in nutrition · 1 cita

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-09-12 · Front Nutr · vol. 12 · pág. 1668302
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
2 citas · más que el 60% de estudios similares · 0.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
39 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
Palabras clave
Processed meat, Red meat, Consumption (sociology), Food processing, Meat packing industry

12 autores

  • Yangyang Zhang🇨🇳Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; Xiyuan Hospital
  • Yanqiu Yu🇨🇳Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  • Ziyun Jiang🇨🇳Peking University
  • Junhong Yu🇨🇳Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  • Z. Z. Zhang🇨🇳Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  • Zhenghua An🇨🇳Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  • Yanhong Du🇨🇳Beijing University of Chinese Medicine; Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • Yiqing Mao🇨🇳Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; Xiyuan Hospital
  • Lanshuo Hu🇨🇳Beijing University of Chinese Medicine; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; Xiyuan Hospital
  • Xudong Tang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; Xiyuan Hospital
  • Ying-pan Zhao🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; Xiyuan Hospital
  • Tangyou Mao🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaBeijing University of Chinese Medicine

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Consumption of red and processed meats has been classified as probably carcinogenic and carcinogenic to humans, respectively. However, the association between their consumption and the incidence or recurrence of ulcerative colitis (UC) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate the dose-response relationship between red or processed meat consumption and UC.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed, Yiigle, and ICTRP were searched from inception through July 2024. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity. A dose-response meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.4.2.

Results

Eighteen studies comprising 1,384,024 participants were included, all rated as moderate to high quality. Red meat consumption was significantly associated with an increased risk of UC development [RR = 1.21, 95% CI (1.03, 1.42), p = 0.020]. Processed meat consumption showed a tendency toward increased UC risk, although not statistically significant [RR = 1.54, 95% CI (0.99, 2.42), p = 0.058]. Neither red nor processed meat consumption was significantly associated with UC recurrence. Dose-response analysis indicated that each additional 100 g/day of red meat intake increased UC incidence risk by 65% [RR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.30, 2.09)].

Conclusion

Based on very low-certainty evidence, increased red meat intake may be associated with a potential risk of developing UC. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to support an association between red or processed meat consumption and the recurrence of UC. Future studies with long-term follow-up and rigorous design are warranted to verify these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024573557, identifier (CRD42024573557).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.