Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2025Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaAcceso abierto

A systematic analysis of the global disease burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus attributable to high intake of processed meat in 204 countries (1990-2021)

Ze W, Su R, Huang R, Guo Y, Yang X, Zhang B

Frontiers in endocrinology · 3 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-09-30 · Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) · vol. 16 · pág. 1635831
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
3 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 2.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
62 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Dietary Effects on Health
Palabras clave
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Processed meat, Consumption (sociology), Nutrition transition, Burden of disease, Type 2 diabetes, Pandemic, Diabetes mellitus
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, risk factors, meat products, middle aged, female, male, global health, global burden of disease, covid-19, sars-cov-2, disability-adjusted life years

6 autores

  • Wangchu Ze🇨🇳Southwest Medical University; Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
  • Rui Su🇨🇳Southwest Medical University; Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
  • Ruiyu Huang🇨🇳Guiyang University
  • Yanxia Guo
  • Xiaofang Yang · autor de correspondencia
  • Baolu Zhang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSouthwest Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

High intake of processed meat is a modifiable risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet its global disease burden across different socio-demographic contexts remains insufficiently characterized.

Methods

We analyzed T2DM mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to high processed meat intake across 204 countries from 1990 to 2021 using Global Burden of Disease 2021 data. We calculated age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR), age-standardized DALY rates (ASDR), and estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) to assess temporal trends. Advanced interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was employed to detect structural breaks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariate regression models examined the nonlinear relationship between the socio-demographic index (SDI) and the burden trend.

Results

Processed meat consumption accounted for 20.3% (95% UI: 18.3-23.5) of global T2DM burden in 2021. Attributable deaths increased 118% from 52.7 to 114.9 thousand, while DALYs tripled from 2.0 to 6.1 million over three decades. Quadratic regression identified a critical SDI range (0.47-0.55) where burden growth peaks. Interrupted time series revealed pandemic-induced trend reversals: mortality declined (EAPC: +0.23% to -0.50%) while disability burden continued rising. Intervention modeling showed 10%, 25%, and 50% consumption reductions could prevent 2,330, 5,800, and 11,600 deaths annually, respectively.

Conclusion

The global burden of T2DM attributable to processed meat consumption has increased substantially over three decades, with critical growth periods in middle-SDI countries. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted established trends, revealing complex interactions between socioeconomic factors and dietary risk patterns. Targeted interventions reducing processed meat consumption could prevent thousands of deaths annually, particularly in countries within the critical SDI transition zone.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.