Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2025Mezcla carne procesada con no procesadaAcceso abierto

Replacing red and processed meat, poultry, or fish with legumes and the risk of gallbladder diseases in a large British cohort

Langmann F, Ibsen DB, Johnston LW, Perez-Cornago A, Dahm CC

European journal of nutrition · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Mezcla carne procesada con no procesada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Aarhus Universitet

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2025-11-12 · Eur J Nutr · vol. 64 · número 8 · pág. 318
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
1 cita · más que el 67% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
46 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Animal Nutrition and Physiology · Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders · Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Palabras clave
Legume, Cohort, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Gallbladder, Cohort study
MeSH
animals, poultry, fishes, humans, fabaceae, gallbladder diseases, diet, proportional hazards models, risk factors, cohort studies, follow-up studies, meat, meat products, seafood, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, red meat, united kingdom

5 autores

  • Fie Langmann🇩🇰Aarhus University
  • Daniel Borch Ibsen🇩🇰Aarhus University; Aarhus University Hospital; Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus
  • Luke Johnston🇩🇰Aarhus University Hospital; Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus
  • Aurora Perez‐Cornago🇮🇹Joint Research Centre
  • Christina Catherine Dahm🇩🇰 · autor de correspondenciaAarhus University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Legumes are promoted as climate-friendly and healthy protein sources. This study evaluated the association between replacing red and processed meat, poultry, or fish with equal amounts of legumes and the risk of gallbladder disease.

Methods

Participants from the UK Biobank Cohort who completed two or more 24 h dietary assessments and had complete information on covariates were included. Information on age, sex, and socioeconomic and lifestyle factors were collected at recruitment, while information on dietary intake was collected using multiple 24 h dietary assessments. Information on incident gallbladder disease (defined as cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, or cholecystitis) was collected from health registries based on ICD10-diagnosis or operation codes. The rate of developing gallbladder diseases when replacing red and processed meat, poultry, or fish with legumes was estimated using multivariable-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders.

Results

Over a median follow-up time of 10.5 (interquartile range: 10.4-10.9) years, 121,593 eligible participants provided 1,246,913 person-years of follow-up during which 3772 individuals developed gallbladder disease. Replacing 80 g/week of red and processed meat with legumes was associated with a lower rate of gallbladder disease (HR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.95; 0.98, p < 0.001). No association was found when replacing poultry or fish with legumes. Adjusting for BMI did not change the magnitude or direction of associations.

Conclusions

Replacing red and processed meat with legumes was associated with lower rates of gallbladder disease. Further research in populations with higher legume intake is warranted to confirm these findings.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.