Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo clínico controlado2026Financiación no declarada

Magnesium Supplementation and Tachyarrhythmias: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Goulden R, Abrahamowicz M, Strumpf E, Tamblyn R

JAMA internal medicine · 4 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo clínico controlado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2025-12-08 · JAMA Intern Med · vol. 186 · número 2 · pág. 183
Editorial
American Medical Association
Citado
6 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
32 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Potassium and Related Disorders · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Palabras clave
Magnesium, Magnesium deficiency (plants), Clinical trial, Randomized controlled trial
MeSH
humans, tachycardia, tachycardia, supraventricular, magnesium, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, intensive care units, female, male

4 autores

  • Robert Goulden🇨🇦McGill University Health Centre; McGill University
  • Michał Abrahamowicz🇨🇦McGill University
  • Erin Strumpf🇨🇦McGill University
  • Robyn M Tamblyn🇨🇦McGill University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Importance

Magnesium supplementation is regularly given to acutely ill patients with serum levels below the standard reference range, primarily for the prevention of tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation. The evidence for this practice and the specific treatment thresholds used is limited. Conventional observational studies of this question are at risk of confounding by indication and other biases.

Objective

To determine whether giving magnesium supplementation to patients with hypomagnesemia, as defined by a given institution's usual treatment cutoff, reduces adverse clinical outcome using a quasi-experimental study design that plausibly allows for causal inference.

Design, setting, and participants

This nonrandomized clinical trial of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing serum magnesium testing was conducted in 93 ICUs across the US and Europe between 2003 and 2022. A fuzzy regression discontinuity design was used, in which individuals just either side of the eligibility cutoff for magnesium supplementation were compared with regard to the study outcomes. This comparison was performed across a range of treatment cutoffs in current use, ranging from 1.6 mg/dL to 2.0 mg/dL. Data were analyzed from August to October 2025.

Exposures

Magnesium supplementation.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary outcome was ventricular or supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in the 24 hours after magnesium testing. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of hypotension or death.

Results

A total of 478 901 twenty-four-hour treatment windows from 171 727 ICU admissions were included in the study. A total of 72 767 admitted patients (42.4%) were female, 98 960 (57.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 63 (16) years. There was no evidence of an effect of magnesium supplementation on the occurrence of tachyarrhythmia, with a risk difference of 0.1% (95% CI, -4.2 to 6.9). This was true across all the cutoff levels evaluated. There was similarly no association with the occurrence of hypotension (risk difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -0.9 to 17.7) or death (risk difference, 1.4%; 95% CI, -0.6 to 5.3).

Conclusions and relevance

In this nonrandomized clinical trial, routine supplementation of magnesium with currently used doses and treatment thresholds was not associated with beneficial effects for individuals with serum magnesium values close to those cutoffs.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.