Music therapy and Benson relaxation in postoperative care: A randomized controlled trial on pain and kinesiophobia after lumbar discectomy
Bagheri M, Abbasi A, Kurdi S, Moslemi F, Mottahedi M
Explore (New York, N.Y.) · 3 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2025-12-24 · Explore (NY) · vol. 22 · número 2 · pág. 103311
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 3 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.3× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 57 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Music Therapy and Health · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Palabras clave
- music therapy, Benson relaxation technique, postoperative pain, kinesiophobia, lumbar discectomy, postoperative care, non-pharmacological treatment, relaxation techniques, analgesia
- MeSH
- lumbar vertebrae, humans, pain measurement, treatment outcome, music therapy, postoperative care, diskectomy, phobic disorders, adult, middle aged, female, male, relaxation therapy, kinesiophobia, postoperative pain
5 autores
- Majid Bagheri🇮🇷Semnan University of Medical Sciences
- Ali Abbasi🇮🇷Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
- Sharife Kurdi🇮🇷Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
- Fatemeh Moslemi🇮🇷Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
- Mobin Mottahedi🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaShahroud University of Medical Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of music therapy (MT) and Benson relaxation (BRM) versus standard care (SC) alone on pain intensity and kinesiophobia in patients undergoing open lumbar discectomy.
Methods
In a three-arm randomized controlled trial, 150 patients were assigned to MT+SC, BRM+SC, or SC alone. Interventions were applied twice daily from postoperative day (POD) 1 to 3. Pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale) were assessed at baseline, POD1, POD2, and POD3. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results
Significant group × time interactions were found for pain (p < 0.001, partial η²=0.339) and kinesiophobia (p < 0.001, partial η²=0.436). Both MT+SC and BRM+SC led to greater pain reduction than SC at POD2 and POD3 (p < 0.001), with MT providing faster relief. For kinesiophobia, BRM+SC showed an earlier reduction by POD2, while MT+SC achieved the strongest effect by POD3 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
MT and BRM are effective, non-pharmacological adjuncts for improving postoperative outcomes. MT appears superior for faster pain relief, whereas BRM may offer an earlier benefit for kinesiophobia.
Trial registration
IRCT20230911059401N1 (https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/), 2023-10-11.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.