Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2026Financiación no declarada

Effects of low-level LED red-light therapy on axial elongation in hyperopic children: A bidirectional cohort study

Li Y, Zhou C, Ji Q, Ding G, Qi X, Li X, Li J, Qian X

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2026-01-10 · Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther · vol. 57 · pág. 105341
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
1 cita · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 5.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Palabras clave
Elongation, Refractive error, Cohort study, Prospective cohort study, Eye disease
MeSH
humans, hyperopia, cohort studies, adolescent, child, child, preschool, female, male, axial length, eye, low-level light therapy, red light

8 autores

  • Ya Li🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Chuyu Zhou🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Qingyun Ji🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Gang Ding🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Xiaoli Qi🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Xue Li🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Jing Li🇨🇳Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University
  • Xuehan Qian🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital; Tianjin Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

To investigate whether low-level LED red-light therapy promotes axial elongation in hyperopic children.

Methods

This bidirectional cohort study included 201 hyperopic children aged 4 -13 years. Participants were divided into two groups: the LED group (n = 51), who received low-level LED red-light therapy, and the spectacle-only comparison group (n = 150). Axial length (AL) was measured at baseline and each follow-up. Longitudinal changes in AL were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed as a sensitivity analysis to minimize potential confounding. In a subgroup of 40 anisometropic children who received unilateral LED treatment, interocular comparisons between treated and fellow eyes were conducted using paired t-tests, and within-subject LMM analyses to assess eye-specific treatment effects.

Results

The LED group showed a significantly faster rate of axial elongation than the comparison group (interaction β=+0.082 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.042 to 0.122; p < 0.001). In the anisometropic subgroup, treated eyes elongated significantly faster than fellow eyes (mean difference = +0.167 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.109-0.226; p < 0.001), leading to a reduction in interocular axial length disparity. LMM confirmed a greater time-dependent increase in treated eyes (β = +0.151 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.102-0.199; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Low-level LED red-light therapy significantly accelerates axial elongation in hyperopic children and reduces interocular differences in anisometropic cases, suggesting that it may promote more balanced binocular refractive development.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.