Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2026Acceso abierto

The Effect of Creatine Monohydrate on Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials: Effet du monohydrate de créatine sur les troubles mentaux : examen systématique des essais contrôlés à répartition aléatoire

Jeryous Fares B, Zhou C, Fabiano N, Wong S, Stubbs B, Shorr R, Puder D, Candow DG, Ostojic SM, Solmi M

Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-01-20 · Can J Psychiatry · vol. 71 · número 10 · págs. 741–751
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
2 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 3.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
45 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Diet and metabolism studies
Palabras clave
Randomized controlled trial, Major depressive disorder, Escitalopram, Pharmacotherapy, Placebo, Bipolar disorder, Meta-analysis, Depression (economics), Citalopram
MeSH
humans, creatine, mental disorders, bipolar disorder, randomized controlled trials as topic, major depressive disorder

10 autores

  • Bassam Jeryous Fares🇨🇦University of Ottawa
  • Carl Zhou🇨🇦University of Ottawa
  • Nicholas Fabiano🇨🇦University of Ottawa
  • Stanley Wong🇨🇦University of Ottawa; University of Toronto
  • Brendon Stubbs🇦🇹🇬🇧University of Vienna; King's College London
  • Risa Shorr🇨🇦Ottawa Hospital
  • David Puder
  • Darren Glenn Candow🇨🇦University of Regina
  • Sergej M. Ostojic🇳🇴University of Agder
  • M. Solmi🇨🇦🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

ObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review is to synthesize and evaluate the evidence involving creatine monohydrate supplementation (CrM) across mental disorders.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO were searched up to 09/30/2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CrM on psychiatric symptoms and safety in participants with a mental disorder. Risk of bias was assessed.ResultsSix articles from five RCTs were included (CrM: n = 126, placebo: n = 112; mean age=36 ± 14 years; male sex = 26%). Four RCTs reported on major depressive disorder (MDD), one bipolar depression. No other mental disorders were investigated. Two RCTs were low risk of bias and three had some concerns. CrM dosing ranged from 2 to 10 g/day for 4-8 weeks as adjunct treatment. In the treatment of MDD, CrM was tested as combination with escitalopram (k = 1, outperforming selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) + placebo; Cohen's d = 1.13 at 8 weeks), pharmacotherapy augmentation in adults (k = 1) and female adolescents (k = 1, no difference vs placebo), psychotherapy augmentation (k = 1, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) + CrM outperforming CBT + placebo) in MDD, and as pharmacotherapy augmentation in bipolar depression (k = 1, no difference vs placebo augmentation). Two trials in MDD found a correlation between CrM brain N-acetylaspartate and phosphocreatine, which was associated with larger improvement. CrM was generally well-tolerated. Two CrM out of 17 participants experienced hypomania/mania.ConclusionCrM shows promise as a combination treatment with SSRIs or for augmenting psychotherapy in MDD in adults. Double-blind, large-scale RCTs investigating the efficacy of CrM, with and without first-line therapies, are needed across mental disorders.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.