Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2026Financiado por la industriaAcceso abierto

Financiado en parte por Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Biogen, CSL Behring, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Medicines Company, Singulex, Amryt Pharma, Moderna, Zora Biosciences, Abiomed, ARCA Biopharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, Silence Therapeutics, Esperion Therapeutics, American Regent, Janssen Research and Development

Assessment of adverse effects attributed to statin therapy in product labels: a meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials

Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration. Electronic address: ctt@ndph.ox.ac.uk, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration

Lancet (London, England) · 35 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Organización sin fines de lucro
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Empresa
Abbott Laboratories
Empresa
Amgen
Empresa
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Empresa
Eli Lilly and Company
Empresa
Pfizer
Empresa
AstraZeneca
Empresa
Sanofi
Universidad u hospital
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Empresa
Biogen
Empresa
CSL Behring
Universidad u hospital
Queen Mary University of London
Gobierno
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Universidad u hospital
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
Empresa
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Gobierno
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Empresa
Medicines Company
Empresa
Singulex
Empresa
Amryt Pharma
Empresa
Moderna
Empresa
Zora Biosciences
Empresa
Abiomed
Empresa
ARCA Biopharma
Gobierno
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Organización sin fines de lucro
British Heart Foundation
Organización sin fines de lucro
Diabetes UK
Universidad u hospital
University of Oxford
Organización sin fines de lucro
European Society of Cardiology
Gobierno
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Empresa
Daiichi-Sankyo
Empresa
Novo Nordisk
Organización sin fines de lucro
Nakatani Foundation for Advancement of Measuring Technologies in Biomedical Engineering
Empresa
Silence Therapeutics
Empresa
Esperion Therapeutics
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Empresa
American Regent
Gobierno
Medical Research Council
Gobierno
National Health and Medical Research Council
Gobierno
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Gobierno
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Empresa
Janssen Research and Development
Gobierno
UKRI Medical Research Council
Gobierno
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Subvenciones
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (A447TR); British Heart Foundation (CH/1996001/9454); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19H03661); National Institute for Health and Care Research (17/140/02); Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (19H03661); National Health and Medical Research Council (1150467); British Heart Foundation (PG/18/16/33570); National Health and Medical Research Council (2009800); National Health and Medical Research Council (1037786); Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (A368TS); Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00017/4); National Health and Medical Research Council (2018537); Nakatani Foundation for Advancement of Measuring Technologies in Biomedical Engineering (19H03661)

Según 43 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-02-01 · Lancet · vol. 407 · número 10529 · págs. 689–703
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
42 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 112.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
67 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Palabras clave
statins, adverse drug reactions, product labels, Summary of Product Characteristics, drug safety, individual patient data, liver transaminases, liver function tests, urine composition, edema, diabetes mellitus, statin therapy, false discovery rate, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin
MeSH
humans, hydroxymethylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors, double-blind method, drug labeling, randomized controlled trials as topic

100 autores

  • Christina A. Reith
  • Lisa S. Blackwell
  • Jonathan Emberson
  • David Preiss
  • Enti Spata
  • Kelly Davies
  • Heather J. Halls
  • Charlie Harper
  • Lisa Holland
  • Kate Wilson
  • Robert Humphrey
  • Alistair Roddick
  • Christopher Paul Cannon
  • Barry R. Davis
  • Paul N. Durrington
  • Shinya Goto
  • Graham A Hitman
  • G. Kees Hovingh
  • Wolfgang Koenig
  • Vera Krane
  • Martin J Landray
  • Borislava Mihaylova
  • Connie B. Newman
  • Jeffrey L. Probstfield
  • Marc Steven Sabatine
  • Naveed A. Sattar
  • Gregory G. Schwartz
  • Andrew Maxwell Tonkin
  • Harvey Douglas White
  • Jane Armitage
  • Anthony Keech
  • John Simes
  • Rory Collins
  • Colin Baigent
  • Elizabeth Barnes
  • Jordan Fulcher
  • William Guy Herrington
  • Adrienne C Kirby
  • Rachel O'Connell
  • Pierre Amarenco
  • Hiroyuki Arashi
  • Philip J. Barter
  • D. J. Betteridge
  • Michael A. Blazing
  • Gerard J. Blauw
  • Marc P. Bonaca
  • Jackie Bosch
  • Louise J. Bowman
  • Eugene Braunwald M. D
  • Richard A. Bulbulia
  • Robert P. Byington
  • Robert Clarke
  • Michael B. Clearfield
  • Stuart M. Cobbe
  • Helen Martina Colhoun
  • Björn Dahlöf
  • James de Lemos
  • John R. Downs
  • Bengt Fellström
  • Lawrence J. Fine
  • Marcus Flather
  • Ian Ford
  • Maria Grazia Franzosi
  • John Fuller
  • Curt Daniel Furberg
  • Robert J Glynn
  • U. Goldbourt
  • David Gordon
  • Antonio M. Gotto
  • Richard Grimm
  • Ajay Gupta
  • C Morton Hawkins
  • Richard Haynes
  • Hallvard Holdaas
  • Jemma Hopewell
  • Alan G. Jardine
  • J. Wouter Jukema
  • John J.P. Kastelein
  • Sharon Kean
  • Patricia M. Kearney
  • George D. Kitas
  • John Kjekshus
  • Genell L. Knatterud
  • Robert H. Knopp
  • John Kjekshus
  • Michael J. Koren
  • John C. LaRosa
  • Roberto Latini
  • Eva Lonn
  • Donata Lucci
  • Jean G. MacFadyen
  • P. W. Macfarlane
  • Stephen W MacMahon
  • Aldo Pietro Maggioni
  • Roberto Marchioli
  • Ian C. Marschner
  • Lemuel A. Moyé
  • Heather Murray
  • Sabina A Murphy
  • Andrew Neil

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Statin product labels (eg, Summaries of Product Characteristics [SmPCs]) list certain adverse outcomes as potential treatment-related effects based mainly on non-randomised and non-blinded studies, which might be subject to bias. We aimed to assess the evidence for such undesirable effects more reliably through a meta-analysis of individual participant data from large double-blind trials of statin therapy.

Methods

In this meta-analysis of individual participant-level data from double-blind randomised controlled trials, we generated a list of all undesirable effect terms listed in statin SmPCs by searching an electronic medicines compendium for five statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin). Randomised trials were eligible for meta-analysis of these effects if they involved at least 1000 participants, had a scheduled treatment period of at least 2 years, and involved a double-blind comparison of statin versus placebo or of a more intensive versus a less intensive statin regimen. Event rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated with statistical significance assessed after controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) at 5%.

Findings

19 trials compared statin versus placebo (123 940 participants, median follow-up 4·5 years [IQR 3·1-5·4]). In addition to previously reported effects on muscle outcomes and diabetes, only four of 66 further undesirable outcomes that had been attributed to statins were FDR significant: abnormal liver transaminases (783 participants [0·30% per annum] allocated statin vs 556 [0·22% per annum] allocated placebo, RR 1·41 [95% CI 1·26-1·57]) and other liver function test abnormalities (651 participants [0·25% per annum] allocated statin vs 518 [0·20% per annum] allocated placebo, RR 1·26 [1·12-1·41]; absolute annual excess of 0·13% for combined liver function test abnormality), urinary composition alteration (556 [0·21% per annum] allocated statin vs 472 [0·18% per annum] allocated placebo, RR 1·18 [1·04-1·33]), and oedema (3495 [1·38% per annum] allocated statin vs 3299 [1·31% per annum] allocated placebo, RR 1·07 [1·02-1·12]). Analysis of the four trials of more intensive versus less intensive statin regimens also found significant excesses for abnormal liver transaminases and other liver function test abnormalities (supporting a dose-dependent effect), but no significant excess was found for urinary composition alteration or oedema.

Interpretation

Adverse event data from blinded randomised trials do not support causal relationships between statin therapy and most of the conditions (including cognitive impairment, depression, sleep disturbance, and peripheral neuropathy) listed in product labels as potential undesirable effects. In light of these findings, such labelling and other official sources of health information should be revised so that patients and their doctors can make appropriately informed decisions regarding statin therapy.

Funding

British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.