Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2026Acceso abierto

LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PHOTOBIOMODULATION IN DRY AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION (LIGHTSITE III: 24-MONTH ANALYSIS)

Jaffe GJ, Boyer D, Hu A, Warrow D, Xavier S, Gonzalez V, Lad E, Rosen RB, Do DV, Schneiderman T, Ho AC, Munk MR, Tedford SE, Croissant CL, Rückert R, Lavin PT, Tedford CE

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 7 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
NEI NIH HHS
Gobierno
National Eye Institute

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-03-06 · Retina · vol. 46 · número 5 · págs. 783–795
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
9 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 69.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
31 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Retinal Diseases and Treatments · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Ocular and Laser Science Research
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, dry age-related macular degeneration, geographic atrophy, visual acuity, disease progression, phototoxicity, quality of life, long-term safety
MeSH
humans, tomography, optical coherence, fluorescein angiography, treatment outcome, follow-up studies, prospective studies, double-blind method, visual acuity, time factors, aged, aged, 80 and over, female, male, geographic atrophy, low-level light therapy, red light

17 autores

  • Glenn J. Jaffe🇺🇸Duke University
  • David S. Boyer🇺🇸Retina Vitreous Associates Medical Group
  • Allen Y. H. Hu
  • David J. Warrow
  • Samantha Xavier
  • Victor Gonzalez🇺🇸Valley Retina Institute
  • Eleonora Maries Lad🇺🇸Duke University; Duke Medical Center
  • Richard B. Rosen🇺🇸New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
  • Diana V. Do🇺🇸Stanford University
  • Todd E. Schneiderman
  • Allen C. Ho🇺🇸Mid Atlantic Retina; Wills Eye Hospital
  • Marion Ronit Munk🇺🇸🇨🇭Northwestern University; University of Bern; University Hospital of Bern
  • Stephanie E. Tedford
  • Cindy L. Croissant
  • René Rückert
  • Philip T. Lavin
  • Clark E. Tedford

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiwavelength photobiomodulation (PBM) in nonexudative (dry) age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods

LIGHTSITE III used a double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel-group, prospective study design. Subjects were enrolled with a diagnosis of dry AMD and treated with multiwavelength PBM (Valeda Light Delivery System; 590, 660, and 850 nm) or sham treatment. A treatment series included 9 PBM or sham treatments delivered 3x/week over 3 to 5 weeks every 4 months (M) for 24M.

Results

A total of 148 eyes (100 subjects) with dry AMD were randomized into the study. LIGHTSITE III met the prespecified primary BCVA efficacy end point at M21 with a significant difference between treatment groups ( P = 0.0036) and a +6.2 letter gain after PBM. At M21, 61.5% of PBM-treated eyes showed ≥5, 23.1% showed ≥10, and 4.4% showed ≥15 letter gains. A favorable safety profile was observed with no signs of phototoxicity. Disease progression to Geographic Atrophy (GA) showed a significant decrease in incidence (Sham, 24.0% vs. PBM, 6.8%; P = 0.007) after PBM treatment at M24. Significant benefit in vision QoL was observed.

Conclusion

Multiwavelength PBM represents an interventional therapy that restores visual function and has potential disease-modifying effects in intermediate dry AMD.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.