Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2026Acceso abierto

Co-developmental trajectories of specific problematic usage of the internet: Associations with microsystem predictors and adolescents' mental health outcomes

Li W, Li X, Tian X, Zhao Y, Li J, Yang C

Journal of behavioral addictions · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gobierno
Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China

Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-03-09 · J Behav Addict · vol. 15 · número 1 · págs. 245–259
Editorial
Akadémiai Kiadó
Citado
1 cita · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 12.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
65 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Child Development and Digital Technology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Palabras clave
problematic internet use, social media addiction, online games, adolescent mental health, depression, anxiety, suicidality, harsh parenting, teacher-student conflict, bullying victimization, junior high school students
MeSH
humans, adolescent behavior, adolescent development, parenting, video games, internet, adolescent, china, female, male, bullying, social media, internet addiction disorder, digital media

6 autores

  • Wenqing LI🇨🇳South China Normal University
  • Xiaoyu Li🇨🇳Jinan University
  • Xin Tian🇨🇳South China Normal University
  • Yinqiu Zhao🇨🇳East China Normal University
  • Jianbing Li🇨🇳Jinan University
  • Chi Yang🇨🇳Lingnan Normal University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and aims

The Spectrum Hypothesis posits that various forms of problematic usage of the internet (PUI) constitute distinct yet related constructs. However, empirical validation of this hypothesis has largely relied on cross-sectional data, leaving gaps in understanding the co-developmental trajectories of these behaviors during adolescence, their microsystem predictors, and how identified trajectories are associated with mental health outcomes. This study thus aimed to: (a) identify the heterogeneous co-developmental trajectories of problematic social media use, short video use, and internet game use; (b) examine the microsystem-level factors that predict membership in these distinct trajectories; and (c) investigate how these trajectory classes are associated with mental health outcomes.

Methods

A total of 1,975 Chinese middle school students (Mage = 13.51, 52.56% girls) completed measures on three occasions across one year.Results: Parallel process latent class growth modeling revealed five distinct trajectory groups: Low-Stable (61.0%), High-Increasing (8.1%), High-Stable Gaming and Moderate-Decreasing Social Media (15.5%), High-Stable Social Media and Short Video (6.9%), and Moderate-Increasing Social Media (8.4%). Harsh parenting, teacher-student conflict, and bullying victimization predicted worsening co-developmental trajectories. In addition, the High-Increasing class had higher risks for adverse mental health outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, and suicidality) compared to the Low-Stable class, whereas other high-risk classes also showed poorer outcomes (though less severe).

Conclusions

These findings support the Spectrum Hypothesis from a developmental perspective, highlighting the importance of considering heterogeneity in understanding the co-developmental patterns of PUI forms, their microsystem predictors, and cumulative effects on adolescent mental health.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.